近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
kochun
註冊: 2002-11-20
上載我的肖像
|
Minolta is not a good brand name Post time: 10 月 27 日 |
|
|
I have brought F100 for nearly one year and I found that though the picture quaulity is not bad but the DC itself is not durable.
"I found that it always out of work."
For my f100, the lens have been out of work that couldn't move and cause me money and time for repair.
Now, it is the focus funciton that can't make any change. It now become a fixed focal length DC.!
I don't have any confidence in Minolta product now!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
kochun
註冊: 2002-11-20
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Minolta is not a good brand name Post time: 10 月 27 日 |
|
|
I would like to buy a new DC.
Of course, I would like to get one better than F100.
Do you have any suggestion?
I would like to try s5000
Any advice?
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
 |
gapman
註冊: 2002-10-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Minolta is not a good brand name Post time: 10 月 28 日 |
|
|
Hi Kochun ! I also bought the F100 for almost a year ! After I bought it, I regret that I didn't buy S45 for paying about $800 more ! (At that moment). The zoom is damn slow and the flash is damn weak ! I did exchange it for 3 times when I bought it ! But for the third one, after I use a month, it can't focus ! Just like your situation ! Only the Macro works ! Luckily I bought the "Hong" product so they repair for me !
About your situation, you don't have any warranty ? About the focus problem, I heard that the repair fees is about $800 if you bring it back to Minolta for repair !
But I won't say that Minolta is a bad brand name as you can see that at this moment, you still can't any brand can make such small DC with many manual functions ! And it seems that F200 and F300 don't have any problems wor ! So don't be bias la !
About your choice, I won't suggest S5000 ! The appearance is really good but it is made of plastic ! And the shutter is too short ! Only Max for 2s ! I rather choose DX6490 ! I think the best long zoom DC at this moment is C750 ! But if you can't wait, I will see how the FZ10 performs ! I see some photos taken by FZ1 and FZ2 and they looks fine !
|
|
|
|
 |
kochun
註冊: 2002-11-20
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Minolta is not a good brand name Post time: 11 月 1 日 |
|
|
Thanks for your reply "gapman"
My F100 gets no warranty now
and I will not spend money for repair.
Yeh, I am waiting for FZ10 too.
How about DX6490?
It seems good
|
|
|
|
 |
gapman
註冊: 2002-10-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Minolta is not a good brand name Post time: 11 月 1 日 |
|
|
Thanks for your comment Kochun ! That's too bad that your F100 don't have any warranty ! But in my opinion, if the fixing fees is $800, I think I will consider it and treat the DC as a secondary DC ! Especially F100 is such a small DC with many manual functions ma !
About the long zoom DC, if you don't mind the XD card expensive, I still prefer 750z ! DX6490 may be the best Kodak DC in this year but I believe that it still can't better than 750 ! For FZ10, I like it too ! But the price......... even the "Water" cost $5000 ! Too expensive la ! I won't consider it at this price ! As I just read the news from Dpreview.com, Scandisk will make the XD card and I think the price for XD card will be cheaper later !
|
|
|
|
 |
luckmal
註冊: 2003-03-07
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Minolta is not a good brand name Post time: 11 月 1 日 |
|
|
A1
|
|
|
|
 |
Feliz
註冊: 2002-06-17
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Minolta is not a good brand name Post time: 11 月 4 日 |
|
|
compact size, AA battery, extensive manual control.
This is the reason I brough the F100 one year ago. But I regret also!
For it's slow start up, no AF assis lamp (difficult to focus in low light), and prolong shot to shot time due to the slow recharge of flash!
Also, I need to set up the time and other personal setting after I change the battery every time in recent months. I took it to minolta's service centre, and they told me it is due to the exhaust of the internal battery and they DONOT has the battery to replace it, I need to wait and no set date!!
What a service of Minolta!
I am considering to buy another DC also. And seems that S50 is good for me.
Is there anyone give me further advice?
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
 |
dcnews
註冊: 2003-09-28
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Minolta is not a good brand name Post time: 11 月 4 日 |
|
|
A1二手價好低...
|
|
|
|
 |
gapman
註冊: 2002-10-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Minolta is not a good brand name Post time: 11 月 4 日 |
|
|
It is true that Minolta F-series is a slow motion DC ! Everything is slow except for batteries usage ! Haaaaa ! But seriesly, F100 have already come out to market for almost 2 years ! At that period, the only competitor is Canon S40 ! For photo quality, F100 is as good as S40 ! About the customer services for Minolta, I think their manner is good ! Compare to Canon, you will know that Minolta staff is much much better la !
|
|
|
|
 |
kennbeat
註冊: 2002-11-21
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Minolta is not a good brand name Post time: 11 月 4 日 |
|
|
I use Minolta since XD-7 series, the service of them is good.
the product also durable and have its image of spirit.
So it is one of the band I support.
|
|
|
|
 |
|