近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
kenmine
註冊: 2003-11-18
上載我的肖像
|
請問有甚麼數碼相機適合初學者? Post time: 11 月 18 日 |
|
|
我有一部 SONY CLIE NZ90,它內置二百萬像(最高 1600X1200)數碼攝影功能,有閃光燈,但沒有光學變焦,只有數碼變焦(2X),可設定白平衡(白天、陰天、日光燈、白熾燈),可設防紅眼,可設定時,可設閃光燈級別(高、正常、低),可設聚焦(AF(常時)、AF(③⑦ЁъЧЬ)、MF),可設效果(黑白、懷舊),可設場景(正常、昏暗的、昏暗的人像)等。
以上功能足夠初學者用嗎? 可拍到甚麼程度的相片呢?
若不足夠,有甚麼相機適合初學者呢?
手提數碼攝影機 (DV) 又適合嗎?
謝謝
|
|
|
|
 |
Toilet_Paper
註冊: 2003-11-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問有甚麼數碼相機適合初學者? Post time: 11 月 18 日 |
|
|
Any camera is suitable if the photographer has the will. Straightly speaking, NZ90 was not designed to be a dedicated camera so I would not expect the same image quality as a true digital camera. However, there is no reason why you cannot learn photography using it, or keeping using it until you found its image quality was too low by your standard. When we are talking about photography, there are the technical side, and the creative side. However, if you are going to buy a new camera, I suggest you stick with DC, not DV.
|
|
|
|
 |
kenmine
註冊: 2003-11-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問有甚麼數碼相機適合初學者? Post time: 11 月 18 日 |
|
|
DV、 DC 和 Palm 的攝影功能有甚麼分別?
除左像素之外,還有甚麼只有 DC 辦得到而 DV 等辦不到?
NZ90 真的不適合用來攝影? 那它的二百萬像就豈不是沒用?
|
|
|
|
 |
Toilet_Paper
註冊: 2003-11-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問有甚麼數碼相機適合初學者? Post time: 11 月 18 日 |
|
|
The pixel count is only one of the many factors that affects the image quality. The lens quality, CCD & software also play an important part. Many ads have tried to fool people to believe that higher pixel count meant better quality, but this is not always the case. DV was designed to perform well on video while still picture feature is more like a bonus (because TVs have very low resolution). DC was specifically designed to take good quality pictures, and video as bonus. Palms are good on neither, and more for fun only. I do not have NZ90 so I cannot tell if it is good or bad, I suggest you use it to take picture without digital zoom. Fixed focal length is not much a concern. There is no reason to dump the NZ90 for another DC when you have never taken any pictures with it to confirm its quality.
|
|
|
|
 |
jammy_2002i
註冊: 2003-09-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問有甚麼數碼相機適合初學者? Post time: 11 月 18 日 |
|
|
其實如果真係想認真去學影相,就會發現攝影真係涉及好多專門學問, 包括iso, 光圈,快門的互相配合....再之後係鏡頭的配搭,filter的選用,閃燈的運用,構圖,光源運用,景深及色調運用等....嚴格黎講, 得罪講句,SONY CLIE NZ90唔算係一部真正相機,如果用佢黎學影相真係好"忟", 我相信相機就係相機, 點都唔會俾palm入面個cam, DV所取代! 淨係slr相機可以換一系列鏡頭就已經焦可取代! 如果palm,DV可以換長短鏡頭,可以較光圈,快門, o甘就已經變左一部相機!
所以,如果你真係想學影相,就應該買番部似樣o既DC~
|
|
|
|
 |
kenmine
註冊: 2003-11-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問有甚麼數碼相機適合初學者? Post time: 11 月 18 日 |
|
|
用二百萬像印 3R 相可以嗎?
二百萬像 (1600x1200) 的相片可以用來做 Wallpaper 嗎?
其實二百萬像與五、六百萬像有何差別對於 3R 相片?
|
|
|
|
 |
jammy_2002i
註冊: 2003-09-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問有甚麼數碼相機適合初學者? Post time: 11 月 18 日 |
|
|
Wallpaper 通常1024X768
晒3R 相我覺得用3百萬會好D~
其實二百萬像與五、六百萬像有何差別對於 3R 相片---->
我試過用三百萬的FILE去晒3R, 效果同用五、六百萬FILE去晒3R分別唔太大,不過如果你影相係用五、六百萬,將來都可以晒到靚靚5R/8R大相嘛~
三百萬唔係唔可以晒到5R/8R,不過效果會好差!
|
|
|
|
 |
Toilet_Paper
註冊: 2003-11-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問有甚麼數碼相機適合初學者? Post time: 11 月 18 日 |
|
|
2MP is good for 4x6" if the pictures are sharp & nice.
|
|
|
|
 |
gapman
註冊: 2002-10-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問有甚麼數碼相機適合初學者? Post time: 11 月 18 日 |
|
|
Peolpe in this web sai A80 is the best DC wor ! Go and get one la ! Otherwise they will say you are stupid to buy other brand DC la !
|
|
|
|
 |
Toilet_Paper
註冊: 2003-11-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問有甚麼數碼相機適合初學者? Post time: 11 月 18 日 |
|
|
Nobody has ever said that. I consider A80 is the best all-around 4MP model in the same class, and that takes many things into consideration. I have been a Pentax SLR user for years, and A80 is my only Canon. I recommend it because it is good. I did not buy Pentax because they are not as good. Please be reasonable and do not split insult on every post. If you have any solid points on A80, say so. I am sure there are many potential buyers will love to hear your points, rather than some meaningless insults. Perhaps you were insulted by some other A80 users before, I don't know. But you will be as bad as they are if you let this silly behaviour going on.
|
|
|
|
 |
|