[流星飛豬]

唔該晒。

[B and H]

睇價錢就知啦, 但當然不是one to one(即貴一倍, 好一倍).

[流星飛豬]

B and H：

唔該晒。

[darrens]

大家大致上同級, but Sigma EX, Tamron SP比Canon L lens平, but picture quality 只是小輸而已
影相不是單靠L -lens, if 高手用Sigma EX, Tamron SP影的相片絕不負予Canon L lens.

[wtfgary]

I agree with darrens.
First of all, skills and experience are really important. My friend has a Lomo camera and those pictures he takes are soooo cool.
Secondly, L-lens doesn't mean it is good all the way. It also has to depend on useage, focal length & aperature.

[流星飛豬]

真係唔該晒幾位。

[Kero_vc]

唔好話白痴~
唔識就要問架ma~^^

[genewch]

Some opinions. I haven't used Sigma EX or Tamron SP lenses. They are very good lenses though Canon L lenses are generally a bit better. However, a highly skilled photographer can take excellent pictures even using an ordinary lens. The picture quality is excellent in terms of picture construction, creativeness, technique, and impression to watchers. So a good lens can help you to take good pics, but a good pic is not necessarily produced from a good lens, except physical quality of the pic.

[sam66]

一樣?

繼續自己對著鏡同自己講啦,講多十次就會信架啦
哈哈