[tommy225]

用開dc , 想轉機 , d70 , 300d . e300價錢都差不多,各位前輩比d意見,
我知咁出可能會有人爭執,但我對以上3部機都唔熟,d雜誌評論又信唔過.....
我自己比較鍾意o記e-300,因為800萬像又係最近出.................

[問世間]

350d

[小班長ErikoB]

d70

[路人丙]

我會選擇D70
事實你本身偏向E300 為什麼仲要諗?

[tommy225]

因為看了DIGI的報導

[B and H]

買"野"最重要自己鍾意, 係您買, 唔係我地買.

如果係我, 我會選d70. 點解, I am a Nikon fans.

But I would tell you that Canon and KM is not bad. I suggest you to go to the showroom and deceide which one you like the most.

Actually, if you want the others to help you, please specify your requiremnts.

[topwai]

下個月出canon350D,pro3不如等等.......
.....

[nes]

咸魚青菜，各有所好！
隨心所欲吧！施主

[Gochien2004]

初哥為求平靚正，300D

[wcdc58n]

真係要睇自己鍾意邊個system喇...
我就會揀E-300...~!

[darrens]

E-300 3/4'lens may be expensive at this moment,
also, you will need to buy at least 2 more lens for E-300...then you will need to pay for.....almost the same as future 300D/350D
otherwise stick with D70 will be better, since the running cost for D70 is lower than E-300, also there is lots of Nikon D/G mount lens on the second hand market side.

[小小生]

"比較鍾意o記e-300,因為800萬像"
我覺得你鍾意o記e-300只係這個原因的話,就不是太了解E-300
其實像素不是太重要,事實上E-1只有500萬,但畫質好過E-300
E-300真正的優點是:動態範圍大,影像銳利,顏色不用後制也很鮮艷
但問題是:雜訊大,鏡頭選擇少

[mangrovetree]

我都覺得e-300唔錯，色水、反差好，有立體感，如果唔打算訓身買好多鏡 (好多C、N、M FANS喜歡收集鏡頭嘛)，買最常用的焦距28-300 mm (KIT 鏡再加一枝40-150MM F3.5-4.5)，都唔駛一萬蚊，入門來說很不錯。

至於noise 問題，如果用iso800以下，問題應該唔係咁大。

[小小生]

E-300我試過 iso800 都覺得可以接受
iso1600雖然差啲,但可用軟件除noise,如果不是晒大相都唔係唔用得
如果菲林機用1600度菲林啲微粒都很多,但未聽過有人話1600度菲林唔用得

[rickywck]

I agree with 小小生. However, based on samples I seen so far, I don't find E-300 having wider dynamic range than other entry level DSLR, but if you are looking for an entry level DSLR with little post processing required and you don't plan to buy a lot of lens (especially prime), then E-300 is a good choice.