近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
terrysuperboy
註冊: 2005-03-30
上載我的肖像
|
Kit Lens VS Tamron A09 VS 17-40L Post time: 7 月 15 日 |
|
|
Dear All,
I need one of the above lens for urgent use (function), which one u are recommend?
|
|
|
|
 |
double
註冊: 2002-11-08
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Kit Lens VS Tamron A09 VS 17-40L Post time: 7 月 15 日 |
|
|
a) Kit Len cheap D and wide D
b) A09 Sharp D and F2.8
c) 17~40 L most expensive but high quality (should be)...
For landscape and I have $$, choose c), No $$ then a) (no way)
For protriat, b), no so expensive and hight quality when f > 3.5...
|
|
|
|
 |
terrysuperboy
註冊: 2005-03-30
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Kit Lens VS Tamron A09 VS 17-40L Post time: 7 月 15 日 |
|
|
Is the 17-40L suitable for function (hotel ball room), as all know that 24-70 2.8L is more suitable for function, but it's impossible to pay $10k for playing, so I consider A09.
So 17-40L and A09, which is more suitable for function? (I mean have a better output?)
To minmium the cost, how about 350D Kit Lens? Is it provide fair result?
|
|
|
|
 |
|