[dcnut]

本人打算由prosumer轉DSLR，因budget所限，可換鏡不是我的主要考慮點，反而是noise及淺景深的優勢，最近入門級中功能最齊的E500也是我重點考慮之一，其他的還有Sony R1和KM D5D。可能是較小幅CCD的關系，E500的noise比APS尺寸的較重，但尚可接受，但我反而擔心淺景深效果到喉唔到肺，對此各高人有何高見？

[雞能]

1. 4/3因為CCD細, 型做景深困難, 景深比正常D-SLR深,

2. NOISE高係因為CCD細又要裝800萬點, 成像散, 多NOISE!

3. 買D-SLR唔換鏡就真係"握"自己, 之後一定後悔...

4. 自己去相機鋪試o下其他牌子, NIKON, CANON, KM,
然後先決定LA

[KHLUK]

Dear dcnut hing,

I have used Olympus E-1 for a year after having disappointment with Canon 300D + 10D which have focusing problems. For me, I am very very satisfed with its build. lenses and photo quality. Although the choice of the lens is limited but most of the lenses are high quality. Now, I am using 14-54 & 50-200 both lenses I can say up to or over Canon L standard. On the side of Depth of field, I can say very close to APS-side CCD/CMOS, so don't worry! I have tested Nikon, Canon and KM DSLR (mid-level class) and now I stick with E-1. You are welcome to further discuss with me if necessary.

Regards,

Michael

[eim21048]

問題係你要個景深几淺法..
如果要全身人像(企直)..我唸C,N, O要做呢個效果d鏡都上萬..
O記推介的是50-200 f2.8/3.5(8千左右).
我唸你要用平鏡的話(如OM 40-150 或 C,N的 50-200 4-5.6)..應該都差唔多

都係個句親自試機, 邊部就手就邊部

[wewewawa]

Sony R1不是DSLR。

[ckso]

I use E-1 for years and still satisfied with the photo quality. Colour tone is good and WB is accurate. In terms of depth of field, when you compare that with APS size CCD, no big difference. Please don't worry. If you love bokhen, use the 50-200 len or if you have money, go for 150 F2. It give you fantasic bokhen. I have one so I can tell you once you try it, you love it. Howver, its expensive !

[kenken75]

不用擔心景深
去Olympus spot 試下吧, 但應該下個月才有得試.

http://www.olympus.com.hk
這裡有地址, 有sample相

[vanvan]

我用緊e300 kit加40-150~~用黎影人像都ok~~
lens size比其他band light同細
你可以上om spot試機~~
又或者去omuser.com睇相~~果度有好多om人~~但一樣歡迎其他band user入黎討論

btw~~我之前用km~~但係km d lens真係有錢都買唔到~~長期無貨
如果你only買正廠lens~~4/3都幾齊~~由14-500都有

[雞能]

你用開乜prosumer???

[beancurdbean]

唔你為乜要淺景深, 如果打雀影飛機, 4/3, APS都無乜分別
如果影人像, 定焦好d:
1) 如果要平又要淺景深 --
D50 + 50/f1.8 ($700); 350D + 50/f1.8 ($680); D5D + 50/f1.4 ($2000)

如果影人像, 150/f2 (=300mm) 距離大遠了
2) 如果要最頂級淺景深人像, 就要 Canon full frame + 200/f1.8L (很貴)

[cola_cola_man]

一枝50mm f1.8 個影深以經可以勁淺...
但仲要consider 個 focus 距離

[ckso]

35-100 F 2.0 ok ?

[beancurdbean]

>>"因budget所限"
>>"35-100 F 2.0 ok ? "
--------
呢支幾錢??

[beancurdbean]

你話唔一定換鏡, prosumer R1都可以考慮, 有同E-300比較 noise:
http://digi.it.sohu.com/20050909/n240367187_3.shtml
4/3夠唔夠dcnut要末, 就要睇E-500 noise control好過E-300幾多

R1 最衰係重(1kg) 同貴 過入門DSLR

[ivanymla]

如果你只係想影淺景深人像相, 冇其他相想影的話...咁我建議你買 Nikon 或 Canon...因為, 佢地一支 50 F1.8 只係幾百蚊....個景深已經淺到好利害...如果想質數好o的...買 50 F1.4 啦...

OM 其本上冇乜大光圈定焦鏡, ZD ED 50mm F2.0 質數雖然好, 不過要成 HK$3XXX, 而且 50mm 定焦鏡在 4/3 系統影人像都唔易用.....

另外兩支定焦鏡 ZD ED 150mm F2.0 及 ZD ED 300mm F2.8, 係重型大炮, 相信都冇乜人會買..