[coltalin]

內地國家相機質檢中心測試數款sony相機不合格後，
sony終於承認手上幾款相機品質有問題，宣佈停售幾款相機。買左可以退貨添.大家係香港小心買入有問題sony相機。


大家可以到dpreview.com看看

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0512/05122003sony_chinacam.asp

[kenkong]

coltalin,

多謝分享！請問有沒有師兄知道：

1/
sony被指不合格的問題，有沒有具體的資料？

2/
除sony的6款被指不合格的相機型號，還說有13款其它品牌相機不合格。那麼這13款是甚麼品牌型號的相機呢？為甚麼沒聽說其它相機要回收退款？

[coltalin]

看返之前報導，好似係白平衡、測光等不合格，影出來偏色。

[man1492]

"影出來偏色。"

不嬲好多sony 機都偏黃，係黃咁咁果隻，唔係"暖"

[singleup]

so called quality tests.... I doubt that
* How to test?
* Set up procedure?
* compared results?

from some of HK computer/photo magazine, they always did some comparision within 2 or more DC(s), testing procedure / results are shown..... Although the comparision method may be not the world stardard testing method.... however, they have put the results....

if u said magazine is bised... how about HK consumer council? They also told to readers the test method and results....

whats their stand point???

[playertwo]

http://it.people.com.cn/BIG5/1069/42913/3947523.html

有問題的機是大陸造, 香港買到的是日本造, 不知是 QC 問題還是 Sony 的問題 ...

[FZER]

新力日本說，在無錫生產的相機同日本的相機，係用同樣生産標準生産出來的，它們的質量是一樣的！係沒有區別的！

[kenkong]

如果有關政府單位出聲話：『如果消費著想退款sony要照退』，sony又點敢唔停售呢？如果唔係我返大陸玩都買番部，玩個零星期咪退錢完事！

我見到D報導全部都沒有披露為何不合格的詳細資料....
白平衡？我部D70s都唔多准啦？
暗環境拍攝效果不佳？乜唔係一般細感光元件的DC都係咁咩？
測光唔准？如果真係好差都會係用家手上發現先啦。
暗環景不能對焦？甚至DSLR都唔係個個型號令人滿意。

最令人不解的是該測試還說有13款其它品牌相機不合格，但卻似乎沒有公佈這13款是甚麼品牌型號的相機和指令這些『其它機』在要消費著想退貨時必須退款。為何特別對sony鐘情呢？真奇怪！

[hippo]

If H1 drop price to $2xxx, I will sure buy one. ^_^

[topwai]

抵能死,sony都有今日喇...haha..........

[insane]

I had a few debates under two different threads in ths forum on this same topic several days ago. (see http://dcfever.com/forum/read.php?f=1&i=347597&t=347597 and http://dcfever.com/forum/read.php?f=1&i=347595&t=347595).

My key messages then were (a) don't be too quick to blame the Chinese officials; (b) there could be different quality products for different markets, (c) Sony can't be right all the time, the faulty CCDs is a case in point.......

I am not yet ready to say I was right or wrong on the above. I don't want to jump to conclusion now since the truth will reveal itself in time.

But the prevailing arguments/sentiments of others then were the (corrupted) Chinese officials must be at fault, and Sony is not at fault. Now that there is report that it could well be Sony who is the one who try to bribe the newspapers not to publish the story (see link in the dpreview news), I am interested to know how these Mainland bashers feel now.

It is also extremely interesting to compare how readers in this forum responded to the Sony issue with other international posters in the Sony forum of dpreview after this news made it to to dpreview today. Here is the link:

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1009&message=16363783

I think it would make a very interesting case study.

I myself will reflect whether I am bias against Sony (which I don't think so I am since I still think Sony's 707/717 are great stuff and thier Ri should be applaused for innovation). I sincerely hope that others will also reflect upon themselves whether they are inherently bias agasint the Mainlanders.

Since I take no interest in whether Sony is right or not in tis subject matter, I rest my case. Others can continue to come up with various excuses to defend Sony like their mothers, or to defame the Mainlanders like their dad-killer, I really couldn't care less.

[老叟]

係大陸做乜野生意都要識DO至得架!!!

[mpalex]

i was in china last night
i watched TV said they stopped selling some SONY model in 淅江
and, SONY Customer Hotline always no people pick up the phone.
poor

[kingkonghk]

sony唔係第1次奶野啦, 唱片又放人毒, notebook又用雞料, 又收人鬼屎咁貴, 壞左去整又收天價, 淨係得遊戲機業務有d睇頭, 仲唔知會唔會俾bill gates隊瓜.

[insane]

another interesting link from Sony forum on the same issue.

again, interesting how majority of readers there react to the news, compared with the readers in HK reacts.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1009&message=16357943

Happy reading. Perhaps it is time for all to reflect on where our royality really lie.