[p_logan]

PANASONIC, CANON 等機仔防手仔係咪唔及 FUJI 的高ISO 有效?
定係....

[maximilianyuen]

有效:ISO
效果:IS

[p_logan]

IS 效果好d?

[eedbt]

防手振和感光度兩者不同 , 在應用上有別 , 不能直接比較

[d2c]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示

[p_logan]

腳 震^^

[kkkleung]

Reminded that anti-shake is not a miracle. It just only gives you 2 to 3 steps faster shutter speed than a camera without anti-shake function.

I previously owned a KM A200. It stated it equiped with anti-shake (AS). I couldn't find the AS function can help me to shoot at low light condition. The images still blurry without flash light. Also, I seldom to use ISO400 or more since the images shall be very noisy. Fairly speaking, it is a very good camera with manual zoom ring (fast zoom time and save battery power), 180 degrees turning of LCD (good for self shooting), VGA movie, etc.

Now, I am using Fuji S9500. I also love it because ISO 800 is usable and the AF assist light can help you easily focus at low light environment. The 10.7x zoom range is manually operated that increase the shooting time.

[balance01]

Let you see my images after using image stablisation ~

All hand-held

1/15s at 154mm zoom


1/8s at 115mm



1/3s at 35mm



1/3s at 35mm



image stablisation is best for taking stationary objects at low light.

[靚蝦王]

FOR static 既 object , 當然 is好啦
for moving object, 就要用高iso
跟本係兩個用途.........

[d2c]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示

[man1492]

"Reminded that anti-shake is not a miracle. It just only gives you 2 to 3 steps faster shutter speed than a camera without anti-shake function."

Anti-shake does not speed up shutter in nature. Raising ISO does.
Most anti-shake technology is introduced for compensating low ISO and slow shutter.

[Real Nobody]

防手震功能並唔係神仙魔法，只係幫到你二至三級快門．．．

不過，有梗係好過冇啦．．．

[p_logan]

FOR static 既 object , 當然 is好啦
for moving object, 就要用高iso
OH! that is the point!
咁高ISO(機仔黎講)係咪比較適合日常的使用呢?

[kingkonghk]

o岩... 如果高iso發展到冇乜noise, 某程度上係可以取代得到is, 但係is取代唔到高iso, 例如影快速移動主體, 幾咁手定, 用埋腳架, 加埋is都冇用

仲有.. 一支腳架就可以有is效果, 但唔可以有高iso效果

[d2c]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示