[goolman]

我想買一支NIKON 70-200mm VR 或 70-300mm VR 防震鏡頭，唔知質素如何

[ray3323]

各位C兄,如70~300VR有貨你又買咗,
最緊要post D 相睇吓,我都想買

[goolman]

好似無人知，有點失望

[Rol]

have not seen 70-300 VR in market, only some C hing tried the test version at Dcfever D80 show.

I have both 70-300 ED and 70-200 2.8 VR.

No sure new 70-300 VR is improved in PQ, if just base on old 70-300ED, sure 70-200 2.8 win at PQ. Just 70-200 2.8 is very heavy and reduce your willingness to bring it outside.

So the usage of two lens is different, 70-300 is light and convenient, easy to snap shoot at street, instead LB5 is too outstanding to snap shoot are people from far away is alerted by your "heavy gun"

[goolman]

我都知70-200mm VR F2.8 真係好重，而且好貴（$12000)相對細粒的我是好大負?，所以想買70-300 VR（$4000），唔知質素點？

好似無人發表意見！！

[goolman]

再推！

[RicksCafe]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示

[Philippe]

兩支鏡用途唔同,即使唔計光學質素,雖然70-300焦距長D,輕D,平D.好似好底咁,但係細左果兩級光圈足以令你影唔到一D移動稍為快一點的物體.不單只快門慢,對焦速度慢先係至命傷.尤其光線不足時.

[Rol]

don't waste gas, he needs true comment of 70-300 vr, but this lens not yet come market, let him to wait...

[beeboy]

多謝鼓勵！