[ysmforum]

D人好似話Canon 色會靚 D..

[yung2]

大至上個名字唔同....

說真的, can0n影人d色會靚d自然d, nikon影風景d色靚d.

[ysmforum]

5D 同 200D 選擇邊部 ?

[yung2]

5D畫質靚d, D200功能好d, 睇你影咩野多~

[pongyee]

有人話各有各好，有人不共戴天。

[chinese men]

pongyee :: 此處是討論相機的地方,我還是建議你請勿四處辣起火頭

[six_seven]

假如揀D200,不如S5會好d呢!

[ysmforum]

但 S5 像素好低.... 唔係真係千幾萬 woo.. 谷上去既.. 而且價錢好似貴D

[yung2]

S5 : 610 萬有效像素, 谷上去係無意思~

[Tai Man Lam]

由第十七版睇起，好快就有結論。
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/FujifilmS5Pro/page17.asp

[yung2]

結論係30D靚d.... @@

[lambertnh]

Dpreview 既 conclusion 係

Fujifilm really can do color well (guess all those decades making Fujichrome help there), high ISO performance is better than the D200 (though don't expect miracles) and the out of camera JPEGs are probably the best you'll see from any digital SLR at this level.

......

Ultimately it's hard to wholeheartedly recommend a 6MP camera that costs $1900 when you can get exactly the same model with 10 megapixels (and better continuous shooting) for quite a lot less. Of course no one is going to buy the S5 Pro for its resolution, nor are they likely to be swayed by a few hundred dollars. And you need to be producing serious enlargements to see the D200's sharpness advantage, whereas you can see the S5 Pro's DR advantage and great color even in a postcard print. It's not for everyone, but for studio work, portraits and demanding dynamic range work (such as weddings) it fits a sizeable niche perfectly.


又何來 30D 靚 d？

[yung2]

但佢呢度又有咁講喎~

At lower ISO values the amount of noise is very similar, though the S5 Pro's overall sharpness is very poor compared to the other two cameras here - though they do improve once you apply some extra sharpening. Once you get beyond ISO 400 the S5 Pro starts to edge back towards the D200, offering lower noise with less loss of detail due to noise reduction. There's no doubt that the Canon EOS 30D is the winner here.

同埋最緊要睇相, 果三行相點睇都係30D既相最細緻喎~

[jackytongtong]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示