[introvert-boy]

各師兄師姊
又有問題，希望你地可以再幫下忙....
唔知 買17-55 (F2.8) 還是17-40(F4)好，唔知邊枝好D呢！
thanks

[jim69]

I had both on my 30D before, now I just keep 17-40mm f/4 only plus 50mm f/1.4.

[introvert-boy]

hi jim69
thanks for your reply, why you just keep 17-40, is it that one better than 17-55 ? :-)

[bb1032003]

introvert-boy,

Go to the following page that I have make some comments with photos on 17-55 and 17-40

http://www.dcfever.com/forum/read.php?f=1&i=506758&t=506758&page=199

Don't want to repeat here.

[bb1032003]

introvert-boy,

This page for sample of 17-40 on 300D,

http://www.dcfever.com/forum/read.php?f=1&i=506758&t=506758&page=178

[Teddy So]

I have both before with my 40D, Now I only keep EFS-17-55 f/2.8.

I feel it is better than 17-40.

[Real Nobody]

I had both before in my dream, now I have EF-S 17~55mm f2.8 IS USM in reality.

I think it is more useful than EF 17~40mm f4.0L

[JSmith]

如果唔會考慮用FF，EF-S 17~55mm f2.8 IS 實用性大好多
但如果心郁郁想轉用FF，17-40係一支好實用既ultra wide，但係支EF-S 17~55mm f2.8 IS又用唔返

[introvert-boy]

thanks for all 師兄師姊 reply and help !
O^^O

[HASE]

17~40始終系紅圈鏡, 級數都唔同.