[boguswong]

本人是用 - C記:500D
1)C記 EF-S 10-22MM F/3.5-4.5 USM
2)S記 F4-5.6 EX DC HSM
3) TOKINA AT-X 116 PRO DX AF 11-16MM F/2.8
請問那一支好~~!!

[look_yau]

1)C記 EF-S 10-22MM F/3.5-4.5 USM

[mic85001]

currently using the sigma 10-20 F3.5,
but in my opinion, go for the F4-5.6 version.
as for the aperture, F3.5 maybe useful indoor during low light.
but for landscape, dont think ure got any use with the lower f stop.

image qualitywise, the F3.5 is a bit shaper in the centre, but the rest just falls under the F4-5.6.
this was one of the regret for buying this lens, thats not what you want with an ultrawide angle.

and also, the filter size, its gonna cost u a fortune buying 82mm filters.
high retail, but low resale value.

[Ison]

10-22 成像不錯, 雖然之前都有考慮過116, 但2支鏡價錢都係差少少, 不過116 無左10同17-22足足5mm , 兩者用料都好好同都係內變焦.
但10-22比較輕, 相信師兄唔會齋帶一支鏡出街, 暗位對焦快, 重有黑角修正, 116雖有F 2.8, 但只係一級快門,

支10-22 光圈
10-12時 F3.5 半級
13-17時 F4 一級
18-22時 F4.5 級半

17-40 同10-22 比較就
17-40 L 係
9組 12片 3 x 非球面鏡片 1 x 超級UD超低色散鏡片
10-22 依支係
13組 10片 3 x 非球面鏡片 1 x 超級UD超低色散鏡片

10-22 根本係一支L 鏡. 不過EF-S . 所以無得冠以L 鏡依個名稱.

[biscuit321]

C10-22 啦
一定無後悔

[alewong]

Picture shoot by canon lens could be adjusted such as dim corner, distortion........... at DPP.

Therefore, canon lens is highly recommended.

[yyz828]

I am using Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8,build quality is much better than Canon 10-22mm.come with lens hood,hard to find Canon mount.

[rankinelo]

alewong CHing,

T116一樣有得係DPP做dim corner, distortion.
所以佢先咁受歡迎 :D

[Ison]

不過我覺得要睇睇師兄自己手頭鏡先再諗,

如果師兄有17-55 18-XXX 未買116.

如果師兄d鏡係 24-XXX, 一定10-22罷.

[boguswong]

Ison ching :
我有 1) c記:50mm 1.8 ,2) 17-55mm kit鏡 , 3) 小小白
咁是否 a116 呢~~~???

[Ison]

是啊，116師兄你的情況是首選。

[boguswong]

thx~~~!!

[mobile_shop2]

EF-S CANON 17-55 IS USM F2.8 -- 鏡王