[icelemon]

Which one should I buy first

1) 24-70 F2.8 zoom $14000
2) 14-24 F2.8 wide $14000

I already have a cheap old lens 28-70 F3.5-4.5D and 50 F1.8

please advice

[snoopybee]

Unless you do a lot of landscapes, 14-24 is not as useful as 24-70.

[Zeiss_T]

I think so

[icelemon]

is the 14-24 easily damage? coz i heard no filter can be used

[mchantw]

buy 24-70mm la..

[zoemui]

不如你問去茶樓食蝦餃先定燒賣先???
上黎問都唔見得會有答案...
不如儲多14k一次買晒...
my 2 cents...

[jolee1117]

14-24 F2.8 + 50mm 1.4G + 70-200 F2.8 la. Like a professional!

[SCforever]

要買的話,兩支都應該要買 ^^
不過要視乎你影咩多,
你本身有支 28-70,如果想入支超廣角影下風景的話,,當然選14-24啦,
因24-70的焦段會over lap左你支 28-70,俾萬四蚊出黎,可多支玩,
不過跟其他師兄說的一樣,24-70是比較常用的焦段,
24-70 是你升級的目標,
真的視乎你自己的需要!!

(兩支鏡王,個人比較喜歡14-24那支一些些 ^^,因它的價值超乎了它的價錢)

[snoopybee]

zoe妹,

我未食過蝦餃
又未食過燒賣
唔知啱唔啱食
不過佢係特點
叫左佢放上檯
實唔會怕失禮

[icelemon]

"14-24 F2.8 + 50mm 1.4G + 70-200 F2.8 la. Like a professional! "

wah............ very expensive..

To play cheap Full Film. I have 50mm 1.8D and 70-300 VR ( bought yesterday). In the mean time i can still live with my 28-70

聽說14-24 F2.8 影人好好ga wor? 又話支野景深好好...

any comment?

[zoemui]

snoopyB,

叫俾人食就話姐...
你"自己"想食乜使唔使問呀???

[jolee1117]

If not mind about weight (1KG) and cannot add filter. Buy 14-24 la!

Believe NASA ma!

http://www.nikon.com/about/news/2009/1221_NASA-D3S_01.htm

[Howardp]

buy 24-70mm la x2

[snoopybee]

zoemui,

我唔食蝦架, 不過人地話蝦餃係點心皇嘛, 唔叫好似差緊 D 野.

[icelemon]

maybe both i buy later

no $$$$