[szeheng1115]

Hi all,

我學攝影半年，一直用350D和kit鏡17-55，現想轉用A16, 請問:

1. A16的相片質素是否會比kit鏡好很多？

2. 我想影一些晚上的人像照片，A16可否令我減少用腳架的需要？

3. 在焦距55時，A16是否足夠產生模糊背景的效果呢？

4. A16是否比Canon 17-85 IS 較適合我呢？

謝謝各位前輩！

[man1492]

A16的相片質素是否會比kit鏡好很多？ Right, absolutely.

2. 我想影一些晚上的人像照片，A16可否令我減少用腳架的需要？No, it depends on what you need, A16 has larger aperture but it doesn't mean that you can always stick with f/2.8, sometimes you need smaller aperture for protrait at night

3. 在焦距55時，A16是否足夠產生模糊背景的效果呢？the tele-end is 50mm not 55mm; the background blurr is enough for half body protrait.

4. A16是否比Canon 17-85 IS 較適合我呢？For me, 17-85 IS is a bad lens.

[no_doubt_kit]

the focusing speed of tamron lens is slower than canon lens (USM).
however tamron lens quality is good and has a lower price.
i'm using A09 and I found that A16 is a very useful lens!
there are many things affect the depth of field. A16 will give enough depth of field.

[ahh Keung]

I want to buy this lens but it seems out of stock. Where/When I can buy it? Pls kindly advise

[正樹]

成成2780,但係就要訂,相機專家同CMK或者會有現貨,但係就要2980

[Philippe]

2.就算你唔介意用盡f2.8.仍是不足以手持影夜景的.Canon 17-55 IS較適合你.
3.足唔足夠好個人,我覺得要70mm f2.8先夠.

[qc_bug]

補充一點，
我見過我個friend 用a16，對焦果下真係嘈到拆天，鬧市中用俾周圍d人睥住…根本唔係u唔usm、快唔快既問題，簡直係恐龍怪叫...

當然如果唔介意既話a16 係幾好既，加埋支 70-300就cover 哂常用焦距，價錢都係同17-85 IS 差唔多…

雖然我個人覺得17-85 出黎既成象會靚d，同埋個IS 影室內相真係超有用

[man1492]

"鬧市中用俾周圍d人睥住"

既然係"鬧"市可來會聽到果下對焦聲

"雖然我個人覺得17-85 出黎既成象會靚d"

1/10 s 已下快門應該係

[shing2006]

SIgma 18-50 f2.8 DG macro 靚D 信我吧！

[no_doubt_kit]

各大有各人喜好。
我就覺得 sigma D color is worse than tamron.