[yingmi]

ａｓ　ｔｉｔｌｅ

[Toilet_Paper]

Believe it or not, the quality of picture is largely determined by the lens quality, the CCD & the software. # of pixels determine the size of the picture and how much details the picture can hold. If all you need is 4x6" prints, you will see no advantage by shooting higher pixels. In other word, higher MP do not mean higher picture quality, only bigger with more details. And yes, there are 3 or 4MP cameras which take inferior quality pictures than 2MP models. A60 takes sharper pictures than 33WR, for instance.

[Everlast]

同意toilet paper 兄所講,
不過始終部部機唔同, 有D 200萬像機真係唔係好掂
我仲用緊 Fuji FinePix 2800z, 曬 3R 真係好掂, 同 Sony 717既3R相比過, 差距並不很大, 所以亦視乎你要用200萬像黎做乜野...

[老叟]

計只來講4R都唔錯,8R就差D喇!!

[felixsusanna]

晒3R 還可以, 放電腦1024 x 768 就唔掂,好多粗糙微粒會睇到!

[terrylamnet]

200萬像一般用家來說都OK，因為好多人都係曬 3R !!
但要放大一定好囉!!
我3年前咪係用P51囉，3R好正，唔見得差過我現場用的CP4500(在AUTO下及如大家都是曬 3R )

[cwlee]

200萬像机,都要睇用什麼鏡頭，我以前部200萬用蔡司鏡晒8R都冇問題。一支靚既鏡頭比机還要貴。