[藍天]

http://www.dpreview.com/gallery/?=panasoniclx1_preview/

[howardchw]

佢拿住個部難道仲係測試版？lx-1 beta~~~
不過都唔錯呀，有張用iso 400影叫做合格呀~~
cheers

[uoff]

thanks sky~
i wait for testing sample long long time la
kakaka...

[kunyu]

睇d sample 相都唔錯,16:9 畫面幾有新意,某情度上帶來一點視角沖擊,對LX1 都幾有期望,不過16:9 曬相會唔會麻煩d 呢!??

[uoff]

大家覺得d sample 點呀?
我覺得同普通卡片機差唔多
冇想像中咁好...
係16:9 幾得意
本以為大leica lens 加大 ccd 會正好多tim

[藍天]

雖然畫質冇預期中咁好
不過d sample係測試機影的,或多或少影響畫質

[yewaitung]

真係普通左D喎，F10的相片比佢還要靚，
一於等埋E900的sample才作決定！

[nlsho]

1/1.65 for 16:9 vs 1/1.8 for 4:3，冇乜著數嘅。
搵個4:3 file裁16:9，可能會睇得出有分別。

[ak2004]

我覺得d sample 相好一般、比 Casio Z750 差、真係有點可惜、若要4,000元、我會買平成一半的 Casio Z750

[Velsper]

我又覺得好過casio.
不過lx1 iso100 d noise 已經唔係太好,有d可惜.

[rt.hk]

請問
LX1拍動畫時是否可以變焦?
另
有關LX1的參考圖片
http://product.pchome.net/pro2005/pro_pic.php?product_id=24727

[藍天]

F10而家越來越平
真係要睇埋LX1 既REVIEW先決定到

[sum38193819]

就咁睇!
casio z750絕對地好過LX1!
LX1的相看起上來有點粗燥!而noise控制一般!
起碼z750的相片精細好多!在iso50-100係noise非常少!
但係LX1呢??真係唔知點形容!
我都係比較過ixus700及z750的相!發覺casio不是差太遠!先決定要z750!

[uoff]

agree with Mr.sum38193819
i check the sample pic carefully again
actually the noise control is no good even in some of the pic with iso80
i don't know if this is the problem of the pre-production belta version
but i can say that z750 is really better than LX1 at this stage

[howardchw]

真的要考慮清楚先，dpreview影既相都有唔同iso設定，反而睇番日本官網全部都係iso80，所以noise先唔見得多！~~~
cheers！