8 月 28 日 (星期四) | 會員登記|會員中心
吹水閒聊
近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 
頁數: 1共 12 回應
上個主題 :: 下個主題  
作者 訊息

HKTaz




註冊: 2004-11-22

上載我的肖像
題目Deep review on Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01     Post time: 3 月 28 日

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/PanasonicFX01/
Back to top

Banon




註冊: 2005-08-20

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Deep review on Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01     Post time: 3 月 28 日

ISO100-400 Noise 勁多, 用ISO800 & 1600 時不是6M pixels.

觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

tam_dominic




註冊: 2002-10-12

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Deep review on Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01     Post time: 3 月 28 日

Fuji F10 high ISO 大勝

Panasonic FX01 與 Canon SD 600 相約 啊
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

balance01




註冊: 2004-12-03

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Deep review on Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01     Post time: 3 月 28 日

? iso100-400, FX-01 同 Ixus 65 (SD600) 差不多?, 如果唔晒大相, 根本係完全可接受 (prefectly usuable).

fm: www.dpreview.com
The FX01 has the highest chroma noise of this trio at ISO 80-400, but there's not a huge difference up to 200 (which would cover virtually all daytime photography). At ISO 400 the F10's class-leading performance leaves the other two standing, but the FX01 and SD630 are both within the boundaries expected from this class of camera, and are perfectly usable at ISO 400 as long as you don't want to print too large.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Gowest




註冊: 2003-08-15

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Deep review on Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01     Post time: 3 月 28 日

noise係其中一個要考慮既因素,但正如balance01所講晒4R根本唔會有問題,而一般人買得呢部機映相都唔會咁痕張張走去晒8R大相掛?何況戶外照完全及格喎,所以冇需要太過介意,倒不如睇下佢其他優點啦,計有mega o.i.s., 2.5" high resolution LCD with high angle view, 28mm Leica lens, 848 x 480 wide movie clips....老實講呢個package真係0唔錯,依家SD咭又平到呀媽都唔認得,俾我就唔會買fujifilm啦,雖然冇錯佢d noise係少過panasonic,但整體來說fx-01真係正好多,起碼28mm係得佢先有。
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

~X~




註冊: 2002-11-20

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Deep review on Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01     Post time: 3 月 28 日

好似唔係好得喎
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicfx01/page6.asp

其實睇條 curve 已經好怪, 跌番落去
好明顯係lose details 個種運算, 重要畫質衰減得好嚴重
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

HKTaz




註冊: 2004-11-22

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Deep review on Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01     Post time: 3 月 28 日

Not really only Panasonic FX01 have 28mm wide and anti shake system in slim PC class. Panasonic LX1 and Ricoh R3/R4 also have 28mm wide and anti shake system.

But personally I like R4 more because the color is more natural. Yes, it may be more noisy then Panasonic, but noice from R4 is easy to clean up, but noise from Panasonic can't. So noice don't trouble me too much.

On the other hand, the movie function in Panasonic is much better than Ricoh I'll say.

FX01 overall is a great camera. It will be my second choice after R4 because 28mm and anti shake function slim DC is my need.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

~X~




註冊: 2002-11-20

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Deep review on Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01     Post time: 3 月 28 日

如果個 low noise 既 quality係咁... 我諗我會要多noise 個張
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

~X~




註冊: 2002-11-20

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Deep review on Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01     Post time: 3 月 28 日

oh sorry ... miss pix
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

balance01




註冊: 2004-12-03

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Deep review on Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01     Post time: 3 月 28 日

真係要成幅相睇, 先知係唔係唔得喎 ~

觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

vanilla0711




註冊: 2005-10-27

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Deep review on Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01     Post time: 3 月 28 日

ISO 800開始就好似唔多得...
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Gowest




註冊: 2003-08-15

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Deep review on Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01     Post time: 3 月 28 日

買得呢d ultra compact 相機我覺得唔需要對解像力呀訊噪呀呢d野咁執著,除非你需要晒8R或者更大size既相囉。If all you concern is noise, then FX-01 is not your cup of tea.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

balance01




註冊: 2004-12-03

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Deep review on Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01     Post time: 3 月 28 日

一般玩玩下?用家, 都係旅行影幾張相, 然後晒 4R,
根本就分唔到多 noise 定少 noise,
反而, 影像震唔震, 曝光有冇錯,
先係最影響相片晒出來靚唔靚?主要 factors
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top
 
頁數: 1共 12 回應
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 



 討論區列表  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password: