[yinyeah]

如題，thanks a lot！

[andrew]

ND 係景物太光時又想用大光圈時用既.

[cfkw]

with a PL, you turn, at certain angles those relfection on a glass disappear( it is a must for shooting thru a glass) and the sky looks bluer as well. If you have a polaroid sunglasses, trun 2 pieces of glasss agaisnt one another at differtn angle. at certain angles, it truns totally dark. Same thing

[yinyeah]

師傅們：咁係咪PL同ND都要買呢？我几鍾意影?景嫁！

如果係，budget各一舊水有冇好介紹呀？唔該！

[oldpear]

PL/CPL係必備濾鏡, 亦可暫時權充ND鏡的功能; 至於ND, 除非閣下的相機是不能調整光圈的, 否則大可省回, PL約百元, CPL貴50%, DC宜用CPL。

[cfkw]

偏光鏡 u need to buy PLC (circular) for reasons people discussed in earleir threads. That costs abt 150 for the most standard size, ordinary brand ones. (like Kenko or Kenlock). for like Hoya or Nikon much more expensive. But old hands say those cheaper brands got a light-tinted color that makes the sky blue. They say no good. i dont care. They say only Nikkor is good.
U dont need ND if u don't go to North Pole or top of snowy mountian or shoot into the sun, I guess.

[cfkw]

I am not a 師傅. Oldpear is.

[yinyeah]

@!#$！早知一早問喇，我arm arm去完北海道旅行，用-ev好難調較，有部分相「舐」?野！ =_=”

[vgar]

想問下呢 , 咁 CPL (52MM) $100至150 可以買到嗎 ?

[cfkw]

in Kowloon photo of yaumatei or kinefoto of Stanley St, you surely can.

[tonychiu1128]

我都想問問CP同CPL有乜分別架???仲有UV Filter同功能係咪一樣??
需唔需要兩者都買??thx!!

[shuwing]

vgar : 　我剛剛買了CPL 一百五十大元。

tonychiu : PL 同 CPL 功能一樣，用來減少水面、玻璃或金屬表現的反光。PL 叫 Linear Polarizer, CPL 叫 Circular Polarizer，PL鏡結構用線性排列方式過濾偏光，而CPL則用圓形排列結構過濾。以前自動對焦的相機在使用PL時會有機會對唔到焦，但現在的DC用PL或CPL都不會有問題。

yinyeah: ND 有 ND2, ND4, ND8，數目愈大，減光量愈多。以我為例，我用Sony717，最細多圈得F8，在烈日下想用慢快門，就要用到ND鏡。如果鍾意玩數碼相機，我認為兩者都要擁有。

[ricky_chan]

我想問一問,我部機係 S602ZOOM 最細光圈係 f 11 ,咁係咪一般都唔駛用 ND 鏡呀??? 唔該晒 ^_^

[lambertnh]

but u have to remember that 602 ISO160 bor~

[jackngai]

不過 F11 比 一般F8 細左一級呢, 就算ISO160 都係有著數的, 但唔代表唔駛用ND..........日光下影人像時, 如果要長焦距大光圈....... S602 A mode 得 1/1000sec 快門, 有時唔夠, 咁就要用ND 啦...........而且s602 係TTL 測光, 唔駛自己計番ND數值, 好方便架...