近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
AFA
註冊: 2003-04-02
上載我的肖像
|
OptioS vs Z3 vs J1 Post time: 4 月 6 日 |
|
|
I just saw the sample photo (OptioS and Z3 from dcfever, J1 from SANYO web page). And here is my comment.
OptioS : The noise quite high, and detail quite poor, color poor.
Z3 : The noise better (dunno why), detail ok. color seems fake...
J1 : Quite poor quality using 2880x2160, ok using 2048x1536. But still color not ok.
it seems Canon ixus v3 color and photo quality better. (sure IXUS 400 much better for 4MP)
=>
Please discuss if u not agree or have any comment.
|
|
|
|
 |
pklee
註冊: 2002-11-15
上載我的肖像
|
Re: OptioS vs Z3 vs J1 Post time: 4 月 6 日 |
|
|
Z3 is bettter than S...though both are using the same lens system.
The photo quality of z3> S. The shutter delay time of z3 is much shorter than s.
Of course, IXUS 400 is better !! but it is much heavier!
|
|
|
|
 |
patwong
註冊: 2002-06-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: OptioS vs Z3 vs J1 Post time: 4 月 6 日 |
|
|
I also saw the sample images,
ixus 400 > ixus v3 > z3 = j1 > s
and if i really buy, i will choose
j1 > z3 > v3 > 400 > s
since i want to have small, but with better movie mode.
even small as s, the quality really not accetable.
|
|
|
|
 |
zxczxc
註冊: 2002-12-11
上載我的肖像
|
Re: OptioS vs Z3 vs J1 Post time: 4 月 7 日 |
|
|
但係點解無咩人用J1 o既?
|
|
|
|
 |
patwong
註冊: 2002-06-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: OptioS vs Z3 vs J1 Post time: 4 月 7 日 |
|
|
have ga.
u can go to user review, and u send message to those ppl
|
|
|
|
 |
ousi
註冊: 2003-03-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: OptioS vs Z3 vs J1 Post time: 4 月 7 日 |
|
|
Well then, what about Minolta DiMAGE F200?
(when compared with IXUS400)
which is better (apart from the manual function of F200)?
I wanna know this since I may choose F200
|
|
|
|
 |
samho
註冊: 2002-06-28
上載我的肖像
|
Re: OptioS vs Z3 vs J1 Post time: 4 月 7 日 |
|
|
IXUS 400 cost too high, and too large for place in shirt pocket (as I'm a 西裝友). Z3 is just make! and photo quality OK, plus attractice 2.0 LCD!!
|
|
|
|
 |
AFA
註冊: 2003-04-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: OptioS vs Z3 vs J1 Post time: 4 月 8 日 |
|
|
actually, F200 should the same level as S45.
and ixus v3 vs dimage xi .... ixus 400 vs dimage xt
|
|
|
|
 |
AFA
註冊: 2003-04-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: OptioS vs Z3 vs J1 Post time: 4 月 8 日 |
|
|
actually, F200 should the same level as S45.
and ixus v3 vs dimage xi .... ixus 400 vs dimage xt
z3 and optio s image quality really .... horrible.... (z3 is acceptable if see optio s.... but still can't compare with xi and ixus v3)
sure, ixus 400 is too heavy (185gm without battery)
|
|
|
|
 |
zxczxc
註冊: 2002-12-11
上載我的肖像
|
Re: OptioS vs Z3 vs J1 Post time: 4 月 8 日 |
|
|
咁你會買邊部呀?
|
|
|
|
 |
AFA
註冊: 2003-04-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: OptioS vs Z3 vs J1 Post time: 4 月 8 日 |
|
|
J1 too large
IXUS400 too heavy
OptioS horrible quality....
seems z3 still acceptable for girls....
but i plan to buy ixus400. ^-^
|
|
|
|
 |
|