[zentrox]

- 717 d 相係咪真係好過其他兩部好多 ? 係咪都好用好多 ?

應該買邊部...... 等救命, 唔該幫幫忙.........

[handsome138]

of course f717 la. it's very good.

[marcoho]

但sony o的dc ,我朋友用開佢話o的色好多時會有問題,
個人意見就會揀canon

[jackngai]

畫質 717 同G5 都好, 但如要長zoom, 咁當然要717.....
某d 情況會偏色, 但唔嚴重.....

[tam_dominic]

I'll choose :

G5 for raw mode with ISO 50 to produce smooth image.
V1 for easy to carry with pretty good image
717 image clarity, F2.4 at 192mm

Depends on how you weigh different factor and you are the boss.

[+ 熊星 +]

G5 just = a G3 change to 5M
i must not choose it
i must choose G3 because G3 more cheaper than G5

[edison903]

我係用717,個人覺得幾好...

買g5不如買g3,差小小野,基本完全一野
買v1不如買717,雖然v1係新出,但係同717比依然有一繼距離
所以個人建議717,或者你可以考慮5400 都是不錯
因為717都出左好耐,就黎有新機出

[kevin_chiu]

717 支大光圈變焦鏡係好正!
畫質亦係好好.

只要唔怕大部, 唔介意memory stick 或配件稍貴係值得買的.

買G5 真係不如買G3.

[McDonald]

我都諗緊呢個問題。但係我就諗緊買717定G3。我唔楝G5的理由是看過一些評論話因G5升級至五百萬像素，在雜訊方面反而比G3的四百萬像素差。加上價錢方面G3比G5平一截，所以我都會寧願買G3。但在717與G3比卻又真係煩惱。我鍾意717的鏡頭，在zoom到盡5倍的情況下依然有F2.4光圈，確係強，夜攝方面亦非常出色。但論畫質卻又偏向喜愛G3，畫面乾淨雜訊比717少(唔知點解717在暗位同陰影位總有好多RGB Noise-一粒粒又紅又綠的雜訊)，總括看來G3也比717sharp，可能G3的對比反差較717做得好。且G3在畫質的選項比717多很多，連最起碼基本的contrast 同saturation選項717都冇提供，加上G3的前簾、後簾慢速同步閃燈，717也是欠奉。但G3的內置閃光燈其差，於最廣角時閃燈會被鏡頭遮，使相片左下角有黑影(真失敗)。而且試用過兩部機，感覺上717比G3易用，很輕易便照到好相片，這點對我來說是非常重要(尤其是在旅行時)。真係各有所長，所以到而家都揀唔到買邊部。

[tam_dominic]

McDonald

The low noise of G3 is at ISO 50 not 100 and over.
Using ISO 50 you need 1 stop faster shutter or wider aperture.
The power of resolving image 717 is better(Ref www.dpreview.com).
You feel G3 sharper may due to internal sharpening.

Just bring up some points to help you decide.