上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
doraemonkw
註冊: 2008-07-03
上載我的肖像
|
龍仔A16 or Nikon 17-55 F2.8 Post time: 7 月 14 日 |
|
|
各位CHing, 小弟有個疑惑, 就係究竟龍仔支A16 (17-50 F2.8) 同Nikon支17-55 F2.8 係咪差好遠呢? 無論用料, 質感, 成像, 速度各方面...
小弟本身已經有支A16, 但又心思思想換支鏡皇17-55, 奈何價錢差太遠了, 望有呢支鏡嘅CHing指點下....thx a lot!
|
|
|
|
 |
doraemonkw
註冊: 2008-07-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 龍仔A16 or Nikon 17-55 F2.8 Post time: 7 月 14 日 |
|
|
:( 無CHing 覆到我?
|
|
|
|
 |
fotohunter11
註冊: 2009-01-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 龍仔A16 or Nikon 17-55 F2.8 Post time: 7 月 14 日 |
|
|
the quailty of images, both lens are so close.
just the AF speed and the material of glass
|
|
|
|
 |
doraemonkw
註冊: 2008-07-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 龍仔A16 or Nikon 17-55 F2.8 Post time: 7 月 14 日 |
|
|
謝謝師兄指教
|
|
|
|
 |
fuga
註冊: 2007-09-05
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 龍仔A16 or Nikon 17-55 F2.8 Post time: 7 月 14 日 |
|
|
I have both lens, but I don't agree that the quality is quite the same. 17-55 is considerable better in all aspect, especially the texture of surfaces, giving it more real and 3D feel. Personally, I thing 17-55 worth the money versus a16.
|
|
|
|
 |
cheuklun
註冊: 2002-11-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 龍仔A16 or Nikon 17-55 F2.8 Post time: 7 月 14 日 |
|
|
各方面都有一段距離
|
|
|
|
 |
|