[清心]

D80+18-105VR

[清心]

我覺得跟18-135冇什麼大分別..只是多了VR^^~

[arafeva]

so you have both of the lens?

which one are you going to keep then?

[gwu1]

D相好靚，好鏡！！

[ringomov]

支鏡係好sharp但暗位lose 得好緊要感覺很硬.

[Obi-Wan]

this lens is sharp when compare with sigma 18-200OS, but not as sharp as 18-55II or 18-55VR,

暗位lose 得好緊要感覺很硬 is due to the brother use VIVID, not due to the lens itself.

this lens is not a good lens as the kit lens

[abcmx]

第123張o係我眼中算靚. 好sharp

暗位lose 得好緊要感覺很硬
即係幾黑睇唔到細節嗎?

[ringomov]

係支鏡既問題，咁既價錢ok la.

[清心]

係支鏡既問題，咁既價錢ok la. X2

[tim1207]

如果用支16-85 F/3.5-5.6, 會唔會sharp好多?
有冇 c hing 有呢支鏡?

[ringomov]

一支鏡Sharp唔系大哂，仲要講求光学質素同立體感。

Nikon 呢個價位比唔到你。

不防考慮Tokina 出果幾支新鏡 。

[幻魔之神]

即係邊支呀,c hing?

樓主係咪用D90+kit鏡黎試影ga?

[Obi-Wan]

what is mean by 立體感 ?

some guys just think high contrast is 立體感 , if u guy thinks so, just forget the following.

I want to point out this this is a FALSE concept.
The 立體感 is governed ONLY by the object, the light AND not by the lens or camera unless you take holographic photos with laser beam, then the 立體感 is controlled by the camera.

Just a story to share: one of my student, an old guy, insisted that his Nikon's lens has better 立體感 than Canon's corresponding lens. So I do blind test to take 2 photos using same lens
(1) to shoot a building in a cloudy day to give very flat view of the building
(2) to shoot the same building during sunset to give a very 3D look of the the buidling.
I ask him which one was taken with Canon, he said (1), my answer: NONE was taken by Canon

Conclusion: "一支鏡Sharp唔系大哂", 不過有D腦都揀sharp個支影靜物

[tim1207]

差唔多$5000支鏡都比唔到呀?
請問幾多錢既鏡先比到 c hing 所講既光学質素同立體感?
請問 Tokina 支鏡要幾多錢呀?

[tim1207]

非常同意Obi-Wan兄既講法