[mkma]

Tamron A18 18-250 3.5-6.3 $33xx
A14N 18-200 3.5-6.3 $23xx
Nikon 18-200 3.5-5.6 VR $5xxx
Sigma 18-200 3.5-6.3 OS/HSM $36xx
請問邊支好呢?

[onlyken]

首選 Nikon 18-200mm VR, Nikon 鏡好保值, 第日唔玩放出去, 起碼仲可以賣返70%-80%既價錢.

[B and H]

首選 Nikon 18-200mm VR, Nikon 鏡好保值, 第日唔玩放出去, 起碼仲可以賣返70%-80%既價錢. -----------> Agreed.

Or 16-85mm VRII + 70-300mm VR

畫質好同多2mm wide and 100mm zoom, 打雀及影遠野一流, 不過重同貴少少, 我就係用呢個組合 ^_^

[Saito]

用得旅行鏡，
最好方便一支過就夠了。
18-200mm DX都係因此以誕生。

當然論變型及質一定差小小。
而且要5千多的價錢，值唔值就好睇人點睇。

[arafeva]

首選 Nikon 18-200mm VR, Nikon 鏡好保值, 第日唔玩放出去, 起碼仲可以賣返70%-80%既價錢. <------ agree to that too

I use the sigma one since you can find some good 2nd example for a really low price thesedays.

The OS is not as good as the VR and smaller aperture@200mm, hence the price difference, but the rest are still as good.

With the price difference and better macro, I picked the Sigma.

[Thomas Ming]

我去青島旅行用A18,還可以,因有18-250方便.

[kevkm]

i used nikon18-200 for my jpn trip. extremely convenient and pic quality is very good. Only if you are professional and want to print in poster size, you won't regret to get one!!
push push push

[Aellen]

I used this 18-200 VR to Thailand. The photos are absolutely acceptable unless you are looking for professional quality or for competition.

[Obi-Wan]

nothing to worry, buy 18-200VR!
very good, much much better than sigma & tamron

from my lenses, picture quality: based on 10MP
18-200VR on D40X > sigma 18-200 (non OS) on 400D > tamron 18-200 (minolta version is tamron OEM) on alpha 100

[老叟]

last time to Brisbane, with just only AIS24/2.8, simple and happy!!!!
for me, travel light is the key!!!