[Mazal83]

各位師兄，我一路都係用支kit鏡黎影相，不過發覺質素始終差d，於是想買另外一支標準鏡取代，之前一路想買A16，但問過旺角同尖咀好多間都無CANON mount既貨，其實canon都有選擇，

EF-S 17- 55mm f2.8 IS USM 但EF-S同FF又好似...
EF 24-105mm f4.0L IS USM 同
EF 24-70mm f2.8L USM 用響350D又好似唔夠WIDE...

想問各位師兄有咩建議？

[ognirringo]

當然係17-55啦
另外兩支L鏡焦段都唔fit
夾硬套落去浪費左支鏡

遲早上FF的話
到時再賣囉
總有市場的

[Mazal83]

thx, ognirringo

咁唔知我去訂a16好定真係買17-55?
17-55好似真係貴左少少...雖然性能好似表面上好過a16

[yung2]

等A16∼

[glio]

表面上?

[Mazal83]

表面上係因為未用過嘛...

最好有人可以compare下...

[man1492]

17-55 IS optical quality 同 A16 相若，17-55 Wide open CA 控制比較好，整體上中心解象較高; 造工就一定係17-55 IS 較優勝

[Mazal83]

thx man1492,

的確我睇過d report係canon比較優勝
但同人傾過
以6.7k比2.7k(a16)確實係好難取捨
固然各位師兄可能話有錢就另作別論
但自己都仲係拿唔到主意~

[andrew6612]

Why not 17-40 F4L?? Buy a second one and try it out. Its pretty good for the money.

[Mazal83]

thx andrew,

although I know I may seldom use f/2.8, but what is the advantage of 17-40 F4L over A16 and ef-s 17-55?

thanks brother~