[stocklaz]

前設是這樣:

1) 菲林機 eos 30
2) 日後一定會買 小白

現在一出機, 希望找到一支普通鏡來作日常用, 再有錢才會買 小白.

3) 不會考慮買 canon 的那支 24-70 f/2.8 l, 太貴了.

那麼大家有甚麼意見可幫下我呢??

我看過的有 :
1) canon 28-135 f3.5-5.6 is usm
2) 騰龍 28-75 f2.8 (最新那支)
3) 適馬 24-70 f2.8 (新的那支, filter 奇大 , 要82mm, 仲大過小白)

還有其他意見嗎??

[kevin_chiu]

唔建議買副廠恆定大光圈standard zoom.

全開光圈質素真的平平, 一定要縮光圈人才有較理想的解像度.
倒不如用原廠的EF28-105. 又平, 質素又唔錯, 分分鐘好過28-135 IS.

我都係用eos30 + 28-105 的.

[老叟]

不如買番支大件抵食既標準變焦鏡喇,防水防塵,岩晒香港環境!!
17-40/4L!!

[superbb78]

I have 28-135 IS and EOS 30
I don't suggest it to you if you want to shoot portrait, landscape. Because the distortion is so high. But if you always shoot at night. The IS is very good for it.

BTW, do you know how much is the cheaptest 28-70 USM L lens? No IS.

[HWC]

I think that it should be 24 - 70mm (not 28-70), the price is around $9000 - 10000.

[HWC]

老叟 兄,

17 -40 L 是否只適合影風景呀?

如果我已有 28-105, 那麼我應買 70-200 f4L or 17-40 f4L 呢? 那支鏡
會多用途D呢?

Thanks a lot.

[ninekit]

how much is the sigma? just my 2 cents, if the sigma charge more than 3K, i will not suggest it, as i also won't trust paying that much to buy 3rd party 'pro' grade lens. not only against the quality, but more the reliability.

my suggestion, go for prime for the quality (as i guess you are like me, fuzzy about quality as well, otherwise you won't say you MUST buy the 70-200 L la) and the price.

OR, buy the Tamron / Sigma as temp solution only if they are CHEAP.

i personally won't suggest other consumer grade Canon zoom, again given your high goal at the 70-200 L.

HWC hing, the 70-200 and 17-40 are for completely different purpose, you should get an answer from yourself, what would you like to do next and decide on which one to take. but i won't buy 17-40 L for the price and quality compromised. again, i will recommend prime wide.

[stocklaz]

其實係有 canon 28-70mm f/2.8 usm l 鏡的, 不過係 1993年產品, 佢新出的就係現在的 24-70mm 那支.

二廠鏡那兩支都不會過 3k, t 記會比 s 記仲平, 我見過有 二千6-4...

真係好頭痛, 又唔想一下用太多錢...........

二廠鏡常被人說解象力不足, 光圈開盡力有不足, 及四角失光, 請問大家有沒有 sample 給我比較下?? 我到現在還是未識睇...... (所以成日有人話那支鏡好好, 但又睇唔到好幾多......)

補充, 我係唔會用部機來影 正片及放大相最多 8r...

hwc 兄: 你想影咩先??? 兩支鏡, 一支係關刀, 一支係dagger, 兩個唔同range 黎.... 不過.. 如果真係喜愛影遠野 or 影人, 唔好小小白, 要分期都要小白....... (最多買水貨.........鏡頭冇 is 冇咁易壞...)

ninekit 兄: 你好啊!! 我唔買 prime 鏡係因為唔想一開始用單眼機就要成日換鏡, discourage 我去學.......(試想個對象都唔會咁有耐性下下等我換鏡...), 所以想買支普通 d 的鏡 (中級左右), 測試下自己係咪極有興趣 (所以就唔一開始就買 小白), 才決定日後的委身大計...

[ninekit]

stocklaz hing,
sure la, changing lens in the field is no fun at all. but my experience is when in the field, you usually have a 'theme' or 'subject' or type of picture in mind you want to take, where / when most of the time you will stick to the lens you've already attached, therefore, the need for changing lens very frequently is really quite small.
here i've found some inconsistency, if you can't even settle for the 'small small white', but most have the 'small white'. you've already know the way to go, why you still need to trial and risk to buy the T and S brand lense?
but agreed, given the price difference between the small^2 white and the old small white, its seems sensible to get the old small white instead.

[superbb78]

I still suggest you buy OLD Version 28-70mm L USM. The new 24-70mm IS is not better than old one. Also, if you buy 28-70. The re-sale value is very high. One good lens can serve you for long time. IF it cost $7000 (new), I must get it. If you can find used one for $3000. Ha....I also get it. Sigma, Tokina, couldn't compare with it. Don't buy them.
Go to photosharp.com.tw, you will know why 28-70 is a very good lens.

[stocklaz]

Ninekit兄:

那很簡單嘛, 我其實對小白的那個range 特別喜愛, 在那個遠距加上大光圈實在迷人!! 而且在小白那一級, 大光圈的原廠鏡和二廠鏡在價錢上的距離拉近了, 不似28-70 這個range 差這麼多... 在不想用太多錢的關係下, 才會有這種想法.

(是否很奇怪呢??)

我想我應去再打下價, 再來想想...

[ninekit]

got u, how much is the 70-200 f/2.8L? non-IS version?

bear in mind, u buy high sell high, i believe, the depreciation in $ will be more or less the same as buying the 'pro' grade T and S brand.

i always suggest we should treat ourselves better. he.. he...