[kyohsey]

http://s87171150.onlinehome.us/personal/828/DSC00001.JPG

http://s87171150.onlinehome.us/personal/828/DSC00002.JPG

http://s87171150.onlinehome.us/personal/828/DSC00003.JPG

http://s87171150.onlinehome.us/personal/828/DSC00004.JPG

[fat_chai_wong]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示

[vaworld]

其實重有5張相起後面, 只要改最後的數字.

[MN56]

我覺得它的Noise都幾嚴重，和A1差不多或者多一些，特別係綠色的Noise較多，這可能因它有兩種綠色有關。Noise 主要是 Luminance Noise。
8M pixelD邊位應該較圓滑，不能算是表現突出。色彩相當艷但有點假。層次應該是最弱一環，什麼花草都一樣扁平！

[kyohsey]

http://s87171150.onlinehome.us/personal/828/DSC00005.JPG

http://s87171150.onlinehome.us/personal/828/DSC00006.JPG

http://s87171150.onlinehome.us/personal/828/DSC00007.JPG

http://s87171150.onlinehome.us/personal/828/DSC00008.JPG

http://s87171150.onlinehome.us/personal/828/DSC00009.JPG

[kyohsey]

828 CCD 係有少少雜訊 <-----------佩服，佩服

[mr.unknown]

這樣好難比較, 兩部機最好同一時間, 同一人, 同一setting影, 做比較先睇到邊部好D

[Toilet_Paper]

I have felt the same as MN56. The noise is particular worse on green colour. However, as a film shooter for many years, the noise is similar to some ISO100 film scanning. Perhaps the sharpness could be greatly improved by using better technique (like using tripod and avoid direct sunlight). It is difficult to judge the true quality of 828 with casual snap shots.

[@香港熊@]

MR WONG :


重死撐?????????????????????????????????
重死撐?????????????????????????????????
重死撐?????????????????????????????????
重死撐?????????????????????????????????

[mail2willy]

咁多位人兄
你地係咪覺得呢幾張sample都算係多雜訊呢?
我唔係好識睇,望住張相都覺得幾干淨丫
不過顏色好似淡淡地

[kyohsey]

１－ 9都係用
SonyＦ 828
最低ISO 64

[superjackie]

比我預差左少少喎,d色好似唔夠sharp,noise問題好似改善唔大!

[nodoubt]

似乎2/3"CCD的Noise Control已經到了一個極限，我覺得現在CCD的技術Noise 同 Details & Dynamic 是成正比的。

[oasisforever]

4color ccd追求嘅就係自然,而唔係sharp,like this two pic,noise方面和我預計的一樣,並不是太嚴重

4 color ccd
3 color ccd

[winson531]

之不過Sony ge 全息減信的確今張柔左wor
同埋張咁多texture, 有noise都睇唔清la....