[alan82323]

我正考慮緊買minolta A1 或者係sony F828, 請問買邊部比較好呀??我唔識架我係初哥黎架..請各位指教o下啦..唔該
仲有我想問o下咩係"AS"??因為我睇到好多報導關於minolta A1 o既報導都有呢個向名詞呀

[mail2willy]

呢個標題可能又會變成罵戰........

我用過A1,如果你以功能為主要考慮點,她應該可以滿足到你,NOISE都算大,但用ISO100應該可以接受,機身手感很好,亦很輕身,電池很強,(我影1G都唔洗換電)

828我未接觸過,唔夠膽話佢好定唔好,不過睇SAMPLE好似NOISE唔比A1少
價錢比A1貴千幾,低像素亦比A1高,點揀?你自己話啦

我後來都放棄左A1,轉左用300D,功能上比A1差,但質素明顯較好,828我就未考慮過

[Elliott]

AS - Anti-Shake: 電子式防手震系統

[winson531]

F828會暗幾級.....
唔佑點解....

[zeusho]

F828唔係暗幾級，而係如果你Set去Real Mode拍攝，在F828英文Manual內第74頁有說明：

Standard Mode - Shoots to make the resulting shot easier on the eyes. The image becomes vivid compared to its real colour and the contrast becomes higher.

Real Mode - Shoots for faithfulness to the actual texture and color, which the contrast, brightness, and saturation become lower. This Mode is suitable for modifying the image on a computer.

[mr.unknown]

To: alan82323

Sony 828 相片質素比A1 好.
Sony 828 Size 比 A1 大.
Sony 828 Weight 比 A1重.
Sony 828 Price 比 A1 貴.
A1 Function 比 Sony 多.

- 如果 Budget 有 一萬左右(Body + CF + spare 電), and 接受到 佢大and 重, Sony 828 is 不二之選.

- 如果 本身有Nikon D 鏡, 可以等埋 D70, 好似話明年春季出

[zeusho]

有一點要知道的是：
A1的光圈是2.8 ~ 3.5
F828的光圈是2.0 ~ 2.8

[zeusho]

還有

LCD及EVF：
F828會比A1好一點 (靚及清)…

電池領航力
F828會比A1強一點

但A1有3D對焦及AS防手震系統，不過我就無考慮過A1。
F828依家賣緊$8380，而A1賣緊$7980 (行價)，相差唔係真係咁大。

不過我提議你去Sony Pro Shop去試下F828 (有機試)及去Minolta Show Room試A1，睇下邊部你鐘意，你係依度問問題只可作參考，因為唔多唔少大家都有自己o既心頭好，自己去玩下機重好。

[mr.unknown]

引述 我小學老師的說話 : "最貴的東西永遠是最好的, 但未必適合自己."

[LKWL2025]

Some false information by zeusho:

Battery Life for photo taking: Sony ~ 185 min, 350 flames
Minolta ~ 300 min, 500 flames

Price: Sony $8380
Minolta $7200

Other comments:

Noise level: almost the same level

Colour: Sony is more saturated

Largest Aperture: Sony is F.2.0, Minolta is F.2.8

Movie: Sony 30 Flames movie is excellent (I have T1)

Protability: Minolta is lighter

Others: Minolta: Anti-shake is very useful
Sony: Make in Japan, CF card compatibility

[zeusho]

Sorry，電池方面我弄錯了，A1是超強的。原來A1跌了咁多價，看來我的資料不大準確，多謝Laulam指正。至於Colour方面，Sony F828的Standard及Real Mode出黎的效果相差很大，Real Mode的色彩表現非常接近原色，而Standard就係一貫Sony相機飽和、豐富的風格。不過我依然覺得買相機都是一筆不大不少的支出，自己去試機為最好。

[zeusho]

另外，在dpreview內
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/minoltadimagea1/page11.asp

以dpreview offical測試Sony F717的使用時間是4小時02秒，可拍攝相片張數是405張，而Minolta A1的是5小時02秒，可拍攝相片張數是515張，不過F828是比F717慳電30%，所以我相信以dpreview的測試而言，F828的拍攝張數將會與A1差不多，或者多過A1。

[阿▁▂㊣▂▁]

講一個有趣經驗:

1. A1 出後我即是買咗，玩咗幾日，發覺功能好勁，但好難操控、賣咗

2. 我朋友唔信、走去買部全新A1，玩咗差不多一個月，托我賣咗

3. 早個星期多Ｄ，我又買番A1 (２手) ，原因是同一朋友想再玩番，而我亦再想試吓克服佢Ｄ短點––一 ISO 100 暗位仍有Ｄ雜訊、最後在幾天努力下又放棄，今次賣咗佢的原因是發覺要好好利用佢就必須要配支5600燈才理想..............、而取捨之下我決定玩 canon 先(因我己有Canon 420EX頂住先)

4. 講番我朋友，佢見到 DCFever 又有部靚仔A1便入咗，而家又玩得好開心、佢暫時決定長玩A1....佢認為A1 操作最好 ^-^ (I agree)


5. 我的下個目標暫定是300D + ２枝 Lens and 550EX....^-^

[poontommy2003]

請問Minolta Show Room係邊?

[insane]

I gathered from other forums that the fast lens of 828 was not as fast as the "F2.0" aperture setting the 828 features would lead us to believe. I was told even for the identical scene under the same lighting condition and same aperture setting, 828 needs almost a stop of shutter speed slower thab those of A1 and others (including light meter reading). Would be curious to find out whether this is true. Also wonder whether this has anything to do with the real or vivid mode settiong on the 828 (to me, such setting should not matter).

Any one kind enough to verify the above information? or offer any insight into this discrepancy?