近日收到不少網友意見，指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站，此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論，並正密切留意事態的發展。
| 上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
| 作者 |
訊息 |
kimchan117hk
註冊: 2003-05-14
上載我的肖像
|
 Nikon Coolpix 8700 VS Nikon Coolpix 5700 Post time: 3 月 18 日 |
|
|
|
我係新手, 好想知道這樣者分別有幾大? 因為佢地差成2千多元!! 我心目中較喜歡Nikon Coolpix 5700 , 一來價錢問題, 二來我睇過佢地既SPEC唔係差太遠(像素同movie就有幾大分別)所以想各位高手比比意見! 重有Prosumer & DSLR 中文係乜?但兩類唔同既機種嗎? 兩者既差別係邊?!?
|
|
|
|
 |
Elliott
註冊: 2002-09-29
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Nikon Coolpix 8700 VS Nikon Coolpix 5700 Post time: 3 月 18 日 |
|
|
CP8700 除左比 CP5700 多左3MPixel 同movie quality好左 之外 仲加左個 AF Assist Lamp 可以minimize "夜肓"問題... 但係AF Speed就好似唔係快左幾多... 值唔值二千就見人見智...
但係如果你係著眼係CP5700 Full Resolution, ISO100 下 low noise 既效果... 我諗都係買返CP5700好d...
|
|
|
|
|
kimchan117hk
註冊: 2003-05-14
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Nikon Coolpix 8700 VS Nikon Coolpix 5700 Post time: 3 月 18 日 |
|
|
To:Elliott
AF Assist Lamp真係咁好? 但我都知晚上影相係通病 X_x
知唔知CP5700大約買緊幾錢先合理?我昨日見到賣5千幾到!!
Prosumer & DSLR點分? 係唔係個D單鏡反光機?!?
|
|
|
|
|
bb86
註冊: 2002-11-12
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Nikon Coolpix 8700 VS Nikon Coolpix 5700 Post time: 3 月 18 日 |
|
|
DSLR 即係數碼單鏡反光機.
AF Assist Lamp 係夜晚映相真係幫助唔小,如果唔係就要用 manuel 去 set 個距離或者會映到 d 相 out focus 哪.
CP5700 二手機約 $3800 左右.
|
|
|
|
|
kimchan117hk
註冊: 2003-05-14
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Nikon Coolpix 8700 VS Nikon Coolpix 5700 Post time: 3 月 18 日 |
|
|
to:bb86
哦, 原本係咁, 咁又想問問, 多唔多機有AF Assist Lamp??
|
|
|
|
|
Elliott
註冊: 2002-09-29
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Nikon Coolpix 8700 VS Nikon Coolpix 5700 Post time: 3 月 18 日 |
|
|
>>AF Assist Lamp真係咁好? 但我都知晚上影相係通病 X_x
由於係暗既環境下contrast 減低 導致好多AF system都無法對焦...
AF Assist Lamp 既作用就好似支laser pointer 咁 射一支小光柱(有visible light 亦有nonvisible light 如IR..)出黎... 照光左既地方contrast 增加 咁AF system 就可以如常運行...
而好處係 就算0 Lux (即全黑) 都可以使用 因為佢本身識發光... 但壞處就係Assist Lamp射唔到幾遠 通常得三米左右...
然而 市面上仲有另一種 減低"夜肓"既方法... 就係當對焦既時候提高CCD既感光度(即ISO)以補助對焦...
而好處係 幾遠都得 因為佢唔係靠本身發光... 但係壞處就係唔可以係0 Lux下運作...
有好多網友都會帶支 laser pointer 出街 以治夜肓機... 效果相同 但係有一點要留意... 以上兩種都係由機身控制 只會係AF時(即半按快門時)才運行 當AF完成時就會自動關閉... 如果自己帶laser pointer既話就記住要係拍攝時熄左支pointer 如果唔係張相就會多左一點....
|
|
|
|
|
JKDGary
註冊: 2002-12-29
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Nikon Coolpix 8700 VS Nikon Coolpix 5700 Post time: 3 月 18 日 |
|
|
my Coolpix5700 always out focus....
for example when i take portrait of somebody, although i set it to manual focus, i set it at the center, i thought that would be allright, but however, when i look at the picture on computer, i found many pictures are out focus, it focused to the background .....=.= .... i don't know is my skill's promble or the camera's promble ..haha....
|
|
|
|
|
Elliott
註冊: 2002-09-29
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Nikon Coolpix 8700 VS Nikon Coolpix 5700 Post time: 3 月 18 日 |
|
|
係一般LCD同EVF上面 通常都比較難 睇得清楚焦點... 況且CP5700既MF control只係用button... 比較難控制 "咁"一下都唔知佢move左幾多... 而且CP5700用MF對焦時仲好似冇 焦距顯示... 只有一條roughly既distance bar...
真係要用MF既 我建議盡量用深d既景深... 如果唔得既唯影多幾張大包圍啦...
然而市面都有其他DC 係用Ring做Focus control既 雖然都係electrical linked... 但係都比button好control好多... (而Minolta 7系係MF時仲會show個absolute focus distance...雖然都應該係approx.... 其他機就冇乜用過唔清楚啦...)
|
|
|
|
|
JKDGary
註冊: 2002-12-29
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Nikon Coolpix 8700 VS Nikon Coolpix 5700 Post time: 3 月 19 日 |
|
|
Thank you very much Elliott ! I will try to 用深d既景深 to take portrait
but i have one question, without AF Assist Lamp, is CP8700 focus faster then CP5700? or just only the same ....
|
|
|
|
|
Elliott
註冊: 2002-09-29
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Nikon Coolpix 8700 VS Nikon Coolpix 5700 Post time: 3 月 20 日 |
|
|
I haven't try the CP8700, I can't say the AF speed of CP8700 is faster than CP5700 or not.
Although nikon claim there is a improvement in AF speed on CP8700, I think the improvement will not significant. But AF Assist Lamp can really help the CP8700 very much I think, since the performance of CP5700 in low is really bad.....
|
|
|
|
|
Elliott
註冊: 2002-09-29
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Nikon Coolpix 8700 VS Nikon Coolpix 5700 Post time: 3 月 20 日 |
|
|
I haven't try the CP8700, I can't say the AF speed of CP8700 is faster than CP5700 or not.
Although nikon claim there is a improvement in AF speed on CP8700, I think the improvement will not significant. But AF Assist Lamp can really help the CP8700 very much I think, since the performance of CP5700 in low is really bad.....
|
|
|
|
|
| |
