近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
MISBWORKSHOP
註冊: 2003-08-27
上載我的肖像
|
SIGMA & TAMRON 17-35mm lens, which is better.... Post time: 4 月 8 日 |
|
|
I am thinking to buy the new SIGMA 17-35mm F2.8-4 FX DG Ashperical/HSM $3200 or TAMRON 17-35mm F2.8-4 Di LD Ashperical (IF) $3680, which one is better, I am using D70 now! I am a new user of D-SLR, does anyone can do me a flavor?
In fact, I want to buy the SIMGA 12-24mm, but need HK$4900!
|
|
|
|
 |
MISBWORKSHOP
註冊: 2003-08-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: SIGMA & TAMRON 17-35mm lens, which is better.... Post time: 4 月 8 日 |
|
|
one more choice:
Nikkor AF 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5D
|
|
|
|
 |
軍佬
註冊: 2002-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: SIGMA & TAMRON 17-35mm lens, which is better.... Post time: 4 月 8 日 |
|
|
Nikkor AF 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5D 有嚴重筒狀變型 ......
Sigma 色調偏黃,逆光鏡片全 flog,但 EX 級鏡身好實剩,對焦快。
Tamron 色調準確,解像力高,唯鏡身較脆弱。
|
|
|
|
 |
mcca
註冊: 2003-11-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: SIGMA & TAMRON 17-35mm lens, which is better.... Post time: 4 月 8 日 |
|
|
i never use sigma before
but i would never buy tamron again as from previous bad experiences
|
|
|
|
 |
MISBWORKSHOP
註冊: 2003-08-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: SIGMA & TAMRON 17-35mm lens, which is better.... Post time: 4 月 8 日 |
|
|
Thanks a lot, mmm.....so HEADACHE now!
|
|
|
|
 |
MISBWORKSHOP
註冊: 2003-08-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: SIGMA & TAMRON 17-35mm lens, which is better.... Post time: 4 月 8 日 |
|
|
Thanks a lot, mmm.....so HEADACHE now!
What about the 12-24mm ?
|
|
|
|
 |
jacprodv
註冊: 2003-07-11
上載我的肖像
|
Re: SIGMA & TAMRON 17-35mm lens, which is better.... Post time: 4 月 8 日 |
|
|
TAMRON 17-35mm GOOD COLOR & RESOLUTION, LIGHT WEIGHT.
VOTE!
|
|
|
|
 |
軍佬
註冊: 2002-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: SIGMA & TAMRON 17-35mm lens, which is better.... Post time: 4 月 9 日 |
|
|
Sigma 絕大部份鏡頭都係色調偏黃,由 17-35, 24-70, 28-70, 70-200, 180macro 我或朋友都試過,的確係偏黃色。
|
|
|
|
 |
MISBWORKSHOP
註冊: 2003-08-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: SIGMA & TAMRON 17-35mm lens, which is better.... Post time: 4 月 9 日 |
|
|
I bought a japanese book for talk about all new lens ( include new / update model ), they have a detail test review of many lens.
I think that book is worth to buy, I bought it at MONG KOK around $210 at ' buy king', escpecially for the LENS RESOLUTION, they have a detailed test, and has a chat to let you compare with other lens....for the test, they divided by WIDE / STANDARD ZOOM .......very useful book!
For the 17-35mm WIDE ANGLE..
for the resolution, they give
TAMRON : 4 stars ( 5 is prime )
SIGMA : 4.5 stars
Nikon 18-35mm ( 3 stars )
for the 逆光test:
as 軍佬said, Sigma is fail, but the Canon 17-40mm F4L USM is very good in this section.
the book name: EXCHANGE XXX ( all in japanese word ) 2004, even it is a japanese book, but since they have many pictures for comparison, U will easy to understand what da meaning!
|
|
|
|
 |
infolithium
註冊: 2002-10-16
上載我的肖像
|
Re: SIGMA & TAMRON 17-35mm lens, which is better.... Post time: 4 月 9 日 |
|
|
WHat is Buy King in Chinese?
I wanna to get 1 for reference.
|
|
|
|
 |
MISBWORKSHOP
註冊: 2003-08-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: SIGMA & TAMRON 17-35mm lens, which is better.... Post time: 4 月 9 日 |
|
|
the shop is in MONG KOK ' CHIU LAU SPECIAL ZONE - TRENDY ZONE' basement, shop name called ' MINE MAP WONG '
|
|
|
|
 |
infolithium
註冊: 2002-10-16
上載我的肖像
|
Re: SIGMA & TAMRON 17-35mm lens, which is better.... Post time: 4 月 9 日 |
|
|
If using 300D, since focus lenth is a multiple of 1.6, 12-24mm is a better choice. SHaprness of Sigma is very close to Nikon AF Lens.
17mm is not really a wide angle lens, it worth to pay extra $12xx to gain extra 5mm. It's fanstastic mate!
|
|
|
|
 |
MISBWORKSHOP
註冊: 2003-08-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: SIGMA & TAMRON 17-35mm lens, which is better.... Post time: 4 月 10 日 |
|
|
finally, I bought the SIGMA 12-24mm EX today - $4800 @ Tin cheung, nice service as usual!
In fact, I really want to buy the SIGMA 17-35mm one, since the Japanese book recommend this one, and the resolution is 5stars ( after I read again, it is 5stars - prime, NOT 4.5 stars ), tin cheung price just $2950, but NO STOCKS...need to wait 10days!
|
|
|
|
 |
Anson
註冊: 2002-03-31
上載我的肖像
|
Re: SIGMA & TAMRON 17-35mm lens, which is better.... Post time: 4 月 10 日 |
|
|
How the book says Sigma 12-24?
|
|
|
|
 |
MISBWORKSHOP
註冊: 2003-08-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: SIGMA & TAMRON 17-35mm lens, which is better.... Post time: 4 月 10 日 |
|
|
resolution - 4stars
abitity of shooting - 4stars
Overall is 4stars
But there has somthing so interesting.
The book test the 17-35mm SIGMA, he writer gave 4.5 stars overall, and the TAMRON is 4stars only, in JAPAN, SIGMA is 70000yen, TAMRON is 60000yen, but in HK, SIGMA is HKD$2950 (WATER), and TAMON need around HKD$3400
|
|
|
|
 |
|