近日收到不少網友意見，指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站，此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論，並正密切留意事態的發展。
| 上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
| 作者 |
訊息 |
myk
註冊: 2004-04-15
上載我的肖像
|
 compare Olumpus C5050Z & C5060WZ? Post time: 5 月 5 日 |
|
|
Which model give a better quality picture?
Will C5050Z add wide lens better than C5060WZ, since C5050 have a larger appendure?
|
|
|
|
 |
老叟
註冊: 2003-04-22
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: compare Olumpus C5050Z & C5060WZ? Post time: 5 月 5 日 |
|
|
same quality!! but 5050 for larger aperture, and more, it uses CF and AA batteries, once and lasts forever!!
Absolutely worry free!!
|
|
|
|
|
dcnut
註冊: 2003-05-27
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: compare Olumpus C5050Z & C5060WZ? Post time: 5 月 5 日 |
|
|
|
Except the smaller F2.8 aperture, 5060 wins 5050 in all aspects. Faster speed, very useful 27mm wide angle, 640X480 movie clips (The movie quality is very sharp, way better than Sony's and Nikon's and even Sanyo's), very sturdy flippable LCD.
|
|
|
|
|
Gowest
註冊: 2003-08-15
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: compare Olumpus C5050Z & C5060WZ? Post time: 5 月 5 日 |
|
|
|
有冇比較過兩部機既起動時間?5060兩秒唔駛,5050就要成七八秒,除此之外對焦同快門反應都差好遠啦,如果唔係為左f1.8,我都諗唔到有乜理由揀5050唔揀5060。
|
|
|
|
|
| |
