[deutsch]

萬幾蚊可以買到部唔錯既單反機﹐觀乎300D/D70最貴都係8千幾﹐甚至頂級PROSUMER DC如8080/PRO1/828等都係差唔多價錢但已有800萬象素﹐HK DC主流仍覺得象素等於一切既情況下﹐LC1只得5百萬象素反而甘貴﹐是否同LEICA扯上關係就可以賣貴d?值唔值﹖

[gaiuswong]

I think it worth mainly on it Leica len, but it really have very good quality, Although very expensive, you see many people like to paid few more thousand dollars to buy Leica digilux 2 more than buy LC1,why? feel a little like use a digital M7, I even hand hold my friend's LC1, feel very good on it EVF manual focus & manual zoom,it worth not only on it quality,config or function, the Leica feel also very important, 值唔值﹖you think!

[dcnut]

if it worth 9900 because of its Leica Lens, then I think the 828 with Carl Zeiss T* and the Pro 1 with USM L-lens should also worth over 10,000. By experience of these 2 lenses, I think we have to consider the lens for SLR and the lens for DC as two different things!

[891111]

"象素等於一切"我諗真係只係一D未必對DC有太大認識既消費者先會認同既o者，一部相機取決於好多野架wor...鏡頭、ccd size、processing chip、設計、介面、LCD SIZE。值唔值見仁見至啦。
f2.0 - 2.4 28mm - 90mm LEICA LENS
2/3 ccd size
Venus processing chip
全手動變焦環、對焦環及光圈環操控復古設計
超簡單MENU介面
2.5吋LCD
快門線唔駛錢
MC FILTER唔駛錢
LENS HOOD唔駛錢
個人覺得合理價錢$8000 - 8500啦

呃鬼人既usm len同紫邊王用2/3"ccd出800萬都可以一開賣果陣賣8至9千...松下LC1WHY NOT WORTH THAT PRICE??

[891111]

"象素等於一切"我諗真係只係一D未必對DC有太大認識既消費者先會認同既o者，一部相機取決於好多野架wor...鏡頭、ccd size、processing chip、設計、介面、LCD SIZE。值唔值見仁見至啦。
f2.0 - 2.4 28mm - 90mm LEICA LENS
2/3 ccd size
Venus processing chip
全手動變焦環、對焦環及光圈環操控復古設計
超簡單MENU介面
2.5吋LCD
快門線唔駛錢
MC FILTER唔駛錢
LENS HOOD唔駛錢
個人覺得合理價錢$8000 - 8500啦

呃鬼人既usm len同紫邊王用2/3"ccd出800萬都可以一開賣果陣賣8至9千...松下LC1WHY NOT WORTH THAT PRICE??

[891111]

"象素等於一切"我諗真係只係一D未必對DC有太大認識既消費者先會認同既o者，一部相機取決於好多野架wor...鏡頭、ccd size、processing chip、設計、介面、LCD SIZE。值唔值見仁見至啦。
f2.0 - 2.4 28mm - 90mm LEICA LENS
2/3 ccd size
Venus processing chip
全手動變焦環、對焦環及光圈環操控復古設計
超簡單MENU介面
2.5吋LCD
快門線唔駛錢
MC FILTER唔駛錢
LENS HOOD唔駛錢
個人覺得合理價錢$8000 - 8500啦

呃鬼人既usm len同紫邊王用2/3"ccd出800萬都可以一開賣果陣賣8至9千...松下LC1WHY NOT WORTH THAT PRICE??

[891111]

sorry 禁多左幾下

[deutsch]

---->呃鬼人既usm len同紫邊王用2/3"ccd出800萬都可以一開賣果陣賣8至9千

呢到大把C記用家﹐請小心用語無謂引起罵戰﹐吹吹水無需激動 ^.^

家陣我身為入門用家都係貪FZ10有恆定光圈/LEICA先至買﹐第時玩熟左先換機﹐目標都係panasonic~

[891111]

係wor係wor....say sorry 先.....

[ngwailung]

我作為FZ10用家，都係用Leica鏡，比較之下就覺得LC1貴了少少...一部等於兩部...

[Philippe]

我反而喜歡LC1的設計多過現今的八百萬像素機,首先用2/3"的五百萬像素機已買小見小.八百萬像素其實冇乜需要,吓吓晒咁大張相真係晒相都晒窮.
28mm至90mm其實最常用,太大變焦能力反而令鏡片太多降低質素.
不過呢咁既價錢,咁既重量大小,不如買單鏡機好過.

[znrandy]

是否一個只是受過小學教育既人,手執一本大學用書便等同大學生學歷? 法拉利配四條爛鬼車輪, 觀音頭掃帚腳, 得啖笑. 而家d生產商只是吹噓,標榜, 什麼老牌名廠鏡, 但最後得出結果!? 是否物有所值, 最終視乎相片質素. 如果支鏡拆得出黎配落其他機用就抵到爛.

[vaworld]

Here is leica digilux 2 review:

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0405/04051002digilux2review.asp

It looks quite good in image quality, if pana's as this. The price may be ok for their fans. It's a cheap alternative.