近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
simonccs
註冊: 2004-01-28
上載我的肖像
|
How is Casio QV-R41, Good/Not Good Post time: 5 月 25 日 |
|
|
I want to buy camera between QV-R41 and Ricoh RX?
Which one is better?
Pls help me
|
|
|
|
 |
Ekamz
註冊: 2003-06-10
上載我的肖像
|
Re: How is Casio QV-R41, Good/Not Good Post time: 5 月 25 日 |
|
|
R41 好食電, 用佢跟樹0個兩粒充電,
45分鐘到玩完, 用GP 1800 mah都係勉強
開到機, 係一部食電怪
|
|
|
|
 |
simonccs
註冊: 2004-01-28
上載我的肖像
|
Re: How is Casio QV-R41, Good/Not Good Post time: 5 月 25 日 |
|
|
Yes, I think it is cheaper, do you know, is it R51 is much better? Or not big different?
Night shoot by R41 OK?
|
|
|
|
 |
south_south
註冊: 2003-06-20
上載我的肖像
|
Re: How is Casio QV-R41, Good/Not Good Post time: 5 月 25 日 |
|
|
R51 與R41 分別不大~
你指想影夜景?...佢的內置程式可以Set 慢快門...最長好似有2秒...由於光圈唔會收得好細,正常來說是夠用
之不過我仲想講...R41 一定唔只用到45分鐘咁短
電量(用原裝跟的三洋電)可以差不多有2小時
|
|
|
|
 |
simonccs
註冊: 2004-01-28
上載我的肖像
|
Re: How is Casio QV-R41, Good/Not Good Post time: 5 月 25 日 |
|
|
Thanks South South
I have a canon S45 before, When I take night shoot, the pic is not very good, I try to set the mode of auto or night, but the pic still not good and blur.
That why I want to know, is R41 shoot on night OK or not.
How about the Ricoh RX? Which one you will choose? (R41/RX)
|
|
|
|
 |
harryboy
註冊: 2004-02-04
上載我的肖像
|
Re: How is Casio QV-R41, Good/Not Good Post time: 5 月 26 日 |
|
|
I own an R51 and it is more or less the same as the R41 except that it's a5Mp. There is no problem with the battery life at all. I don't know why someone would say it can't last. Must be a joke or something. For the 21 scenes, they are pretty good. I tried (night with portrait) and the result was excellent. I even didn't use a tripod but I did try to hold the cam very still. I wonder if you didn't use a tripod or you are not holding your cam steady enough when taking night pictures. I think your S45 could do better than that, it's a Canon! I haven't tried the RX but think it is also a good candidate especially if you are looking for a cam with wide angle lens. Judging from the spec. it is a decent cam. It also comes with a pretty large lcd to browse your pics. It also uses AA's but don't know if they can last as long as the R41. I think you should try both out at night to compare their qualities. Happy shooting!
|
|
|
|
 |
simonccs
註冊: 2004-01-28
上載我的肖像
|
Re: How is Casio QV-R41, Good/Not Good Post time: 5 月 26 日 |
|
|
Thanks harryboy
I think, I am not hold the S45 steady enough and I don't have a tripod too.
So I am difficult to shoot the OK photo at night.
From the spec, I think R41 should better than RX, at least R41 has 4Mp.
If it is possible, I wish I can see the photo of R41 and RX too.
Can anyone provide the sample photos?
|
|
|
|
 |
|