[intel875]

如果300d 加 sigma 18-125mm, 好唔好呢?
定係用300D kit + ef 55-200mm 好?
300D 係唔係真夠用?
加邊隻閃燈可做埋後簾同步?
先謝謝

[intel875]

幫幫呀!!!

[moliuguy]

我都諗緊買18-125代替支kit lens, 個range無得頂
外閃我就用sigma 500 super, 有後簾

[intel875]

謝謝你, 咁請問sigma 500 super賣幾多錢呀?

[moliuguy]

行貨1550左右la, 水貨平一兩佰

[loting-hk]

如果你想一支鏡過就sigma 18-125mm了，但之前睇過ｄ師兄說此鏡質素一般，而且也浪費了支kit 鏡。
我覺得反而用kit + EF55-200mm 會更好，你可以查看之前的討論。

[hon_hon]

我就覺得支sigma 18-125唔多掂
俾我係唔會買佢...
我唔係因為佢個價平就去買
而係佢成像真係唔多掂~

[moliuguy]

18-125勝在唔洗下下換鏡, 成像當然無低倍數zoom鏡咁好
此外, tamron同sigma都各有支24-135, 唔知又會唔會比支18-125優勝?
話時話, 支ef55-200質素如何?

[warrenl]

I have bought Sigma 18-125 from my 10D. The lens is used for travelling photos taking althouh I have Tokina 17mm and EF22-55mm.

It is inconvenient to change the lens during travelling, also the dust may come into the suface of CMOS.

I prefect to have a lens for wide angle to tele lens.

The quality is accepted, less distortion but it is not sharp as the L lens, especially using the lens in Canon DSLR( the sensors are the CMOS).

But if you have the kit lens, you should bought the EF50-200mm as you alrady have the wide angle lens.

[loting-hk]

我也想知道EF 55-200mm的質素如何？

[wtfgary]

I have been using EF 55-200mm USM for 2 months. Focus is fast and quiet, quality is acceptable (in my point of view).

The bad thing is, the lens is a plastic lens + plastice mount,

[moliuguy]

any EF55-200 full size sample for reference? thank you.

[intel875]

好多謝大家回覆,
看上, 好似kit lens + 50-200mm 更好wor,
再問, 影花用kit lens + 50-200mm 夠唔夠呢? 我想影花, 咩花都想影, 特別鐘意影荷花, 如果另外買支macro lens, 好似又貴, 又唔實用, 因為我唔會影昆蟲, 請各位大俠指點指點!!
仲有, 點解好似比較多人用300d 呢? 唔係d70 勁d 嗎? 300d 有d 咩優勢?

[moliuguy]

EF55-200 vs Sigma 70-300 APO Macro Super
邊支成像好d呢?

[intel875]

係wor, 如何kit lens + Sigma 70-300 APO Macro Super
咁又有wide, tele 又 有macro, 都幾正wor, 不知Sigma 70-300 APO Macro Super成像點呢? 會唔會因中間少了60mm焦距而會唔方便呢?