[mpalex]

hi! 大家好
我轉投canon, 想請教一下, 邊支鏡好
我唸如果within budget, 一定要17-40mm f4L
(我夠想要16-35 2.8L, 但係成皮野, 我老婆熔左我!)

如果決定左支wide (17-40), 我又想一支鏡攪惦中距同長距, DO 呢支好唔好?
我又知好多人兄用70-200 f2.8L, 70-200 f4L, 以上3支邊支好? 我應該買邊支?

我唸自己先買2支, wide 一定要, 另加一支...

邊度買鏡最平?

最後, 我等左20D好耐喇... canon 25號先有新貨.. 有冇人兄知邊度有現貨? 幾錢?

Thanks for all help!
Alex

[肥叉飯]

咁你知唔知 EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM 幾多錢丫, 如果知應該會少左一個選擇!

[letni]

如果你買do鏡, 你老婆熔硬你,
因為do鏡都係成萬元

[patwong]

Asked DO lens in Laser / DCFever, $89xx
EF 70-200 f/2.8L in shing shing $93xx
EF 70-200 f/4L in shing shing $53xx

Actually,
quality will be
70-200 f/2.8L > 70-200 f/4L > 70-300DO
mobility will be
70-300DO > 70-200 f/4L > 70-200 f/2.8L

see what u want.
but cost/performance is 70-200 f/4L highest.

[mpalex]

thanks for all info...
DO lens 89xx (but can function as 2 lens 中距 & 長距)
actually, how is the DO lens... why expensive?
70-200 f4L has no IS function... is it useful? i never tried before.

also, why quality of 70-200 f2.8L better than f4L? they also L lens. if i use f8 for shot, is it same quality?

another question, the flash, ex580 is coming, but price is unacceptable...
for beginner of flash user, what flash i have to buy? 580? 550? other brand?

[Mike Chan]

I have both 70~200 f2.8L and 70~300 /4.5-5.6 DO. The performance of these 2 lens are just quite close. The latter has its merit when you took photos under very dim light without tripod (because of its 2 level IS) and is lighter in weight. I think only lab test can tell their differences. For most photographers, it is hard to tell the degree of difference. The only thing to consider is their price - $98xx for the DO lens and $93xx for the 70~200 L lens. For other Canon users, they may have their preference for the 70~200 L lens over the DO lens, but for me, I have no regret to have bought these 2 lens. So you may just choose either one according to your own preference, there should be no regret of your choice!

[mpalex]

thanks mike chan!

but, how about the 70-200 f4L?
買左呢支, 以後會唔會後悔? (之後身痕又想買...)

[letni]

後悔? 你覺得後悔的話就不買好了

[ananlau]

呵呵.....怕老婆會發達呀...
唔好買DO喇...~~哈哈哈哈哈哈~~~

[ivan_ccf]

你覺得後悔的話.....
就不如一開始買支 70-200 f/2.8 L USM IS 算吧啦
包你唔會後悔.... 而且有排唔洗買新鏡...
anyway, 你都預左約$9,xxx 買支 EF 70-300mm DO 鏡 ....
不如買支 EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM or
EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM 好過~~~
之後... 再買一個 1.4x or 2x tele up to 280mm+
其實你考慮得70-200 f/4 L USM 依支鏡... 都係為左錢既問題o者....
後唔後悔都係睇自己...... 好大部情況之下... f/4 都好夠用...
除非你常常需要係一個暗的環境下影野啦~~
"識得用... 其實好好用"

[ananlau]

噤就用返...dc...唔使配鏡~~哈哈
講笑咋!

[Mike Chan]

純以價錢出發應取70~200 2.8 L，我唔揀 70-200 f4L，雖然平的但係大光圈確有好處，陰天或者黃昏影相你就會領會到個中優點啦！得 f4唔多夠尤其是手上冇400/800度菲林的時候。(唔好介意，我都有Canon DSLR，但當我想搏一兩張大相，我一定用Canon EOS1V !)

[HASE]

應該話你要的一兩張大相要幾大先! 8R一般都可以叫大相架喎!

[Mike Chan]

8~12R, of course!

[mcdull2k]

go for the sigma 80-400 EX OS HSM....
cheap .. and heavy.. haha