近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
LKWL2025
註冊: 2003-04-13
上載我的肖像
|
Canon 70-200 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L or 70-200 F2.8 IS L for 20D Post time: 11 月 19 日 |
|
|
Which lens is better for 20D?
|
|
|
|
 |
gaiuswong
註冊: 2004-03-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon 70-200 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L or 70-200 F2.8 IS L for 20D Post time: 11 月 19 日 |
|
|
have money 70-200 F2.8 IS L for sure la....
|
|
|
|
 |
pkhwong
註冊: 2004-08-21
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon 70-200 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L or 70-200 F2.8 IS L for 20D Post time: 11 月 19 日 |
|
|
What is your budget? If money is not problem, of course go for 2.8 with IS la.
|
|
|
|
 |
b_kid
註冊: 2003-02-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon 70-200 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L or 70-200 F2.8 IS L for 20D Post time: 11 月 19 日 |
|
|
請問 70-200 F2.8 IS L 大約什麼價位?是否有錢都未必時常有貨?
想?定資料看看是否負擔得起 ^_^"
|
|
|
|
 |
fd3
註冊: 2004-09-22
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon 70-200 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L or 70-200 F2.8 IS L for Post time: 11 月 19 日 |
|
|
around $13300....its available in many Camera shop...
|
|
|
|
 |
Mike Chan
註冊: 2004-09-14
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon 70-200 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L or 70-200 F2.8 IS L for Post time: 11 月 19 日 |
|
|
我就一定投70-200 F2.8 L一票,費事第日後悔!
|
|
|
|
 |
realproa
註冊: 2002-10-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon 70-200 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L or 70-200 F2.8 IS L for Post time: 11 月 19 日 |
|
|
The power of 70-200 F2.8 IS L. The photo was taken without tripod.
http://www.dcfever.com/photosharing/viewphoto.php?photoID=197868
|
|
|
|
 |
patwong
註冊: 2002-06-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon 70-200 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L or 70-200 F2.8 IS L for Post time: 11 月 19 日 |
|
|
70-200 f/2.8L is the best quality lens.
70-200 f/4L has similar quality with 70-200 f/2.8L, but a stop smaller aperature than it. But mobility is the best.
70-200 f/2.8L IS has IS, but the quality is poorest among three.
|
|
|
|
 |
genewch
註冊: 2004-09-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon 70-200 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L or 70-200 F2.8 IS L for Post time: 11 月 20 日 |
|
|
Does the IS affect the lens quality?
What about Sigma 100-300mm f4? Is it not common?
|
|
|
|
 |
b_kid
註冊: 2003-02-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon 70-200 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L or 70-200 F2.8 IS L for Post time: 11 月 20 日 |
|
|
patwong:
?!70-200 f/2.8L IS 反而係最差呀,乜唔係 IS + f/2.8L 係最 Top 咩,點解 picture quality 會係最差?
|
|
|
|
 |
baronng
註冊: 2004-09-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon 70-200 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L or 70-200 F2.8 IS L for Post time: 11 月 20 日 |
|
|
have $$$$$$$$$
70-200 f/2.8L IS
24-70 f/2.8L
16-35 f/2.8L
have $$$
70-200 f/4
17-40 f/4
50 f/1.4L
no $
try sigma
|
|
|
|
 |
ngu3288
註冊: 2002-12-11
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon 70-200 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L or 70-200 F2.8 IS L for Post time: 11 月 20 日 |
|
|
No $
Should sell your camera.
|
|
|
|
 |
realproa
註冊: 2002-10-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon 70-200 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L or 70-200 F2.8 IS L for Post time: 11 月 20 日 |
|
|
If 70-200 F/4 and F/2.8 score mark 95/100 and 70-200 F/2/8 IS score mark 91/100. Could you find the difference in picture quality?
|
|
|
|
 |
genewch
註冊: 2004-09-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon 70-200 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L or 70-200 F2.8 IS L for Post time: 11 月 20 日 |
|
|
Are there any scientific test reports to compare these 3 lenses? Does IS affect picture quality?
|
|
|
|
 |
Gabrielc
註冊: 2004-09-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon 70-200 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L or 70-200 F2.8 IS L for Post time: 11 月 20 日 |
|
|
用途都十分需要考慮!
|
|
|
|
 |
|