[鬼火]

我之前用過F70(老豆既)﹐但係而家自己出黎讀書又覺得部O記C720開始老爺同埋始終鍾意SLR既感覺多D...

我冇鏡頭包袱所以冇話邊部會慳D錢﹐但係個人感覺就buy D70同E300多D...

我試下列出每部機既優/缺點﹐各位認為我有漏既請更正更正 :)
300D: CMOS (唔知好定壞)﹐多鏡support﹐最平 (壞:內閃非常弱﹐好膠)
D70: 功能齊﹐kit鏡好﹐多鏡support (壞:最貴﹐冇手把)
ist* Ds: 最細﹐用AA電 (壞: kit鏡爛?﹐影像soft)
E300: 4/3 (一樣唔知好定壞)﹐可內外閃同用﹐超音防塵 (壞: kit鏡爛?﹐靚鏡貴﹐少外廠鏡或用轉接環)

各位有何高見?

[gaiuswong]

呢d又係打大交題目,以前講完又講,重覆又重覆,唔答得唔得呀!自已撈番d post黎睇啦.

[SiegfriedDK]

機身其實都差唔遠
問題睇下你喜歡咩類型色彩同影像傾向

你玩開既就唔建議買呢d入門機...
真係比較硬膠

[gaiuswong]

睇你會dum幾多錢落去,先巧慮你影邊類相多邊種鏡特性較適合你,如Canon柔,Nikon利等..system配件選擇多唔多,貴唔貴,或呢隻牌子糸統有冇發展潛力,因為有d佢套system鏡種唔齊你有錢都冇得你買,除非你當佢DC咁用一機kit鏡就滿足就可以唔使諗咁多.

[mrskyhook]

if u don't mind Pentax lenses are not common, suggest u to buy *ist DS becoz among 300D, D70 and it, its build quality is best (metal frame inside), the viewfinder is the biggest, the body is the smallest and lightest.

E300 is too unknown now.

[philip5cf]

如果你唔肯定 cmos 好定壞，睇下點解 canon 繼續用佢出頂級機，又或者點解 kodak 頂級機又用 cmos，又或者聞說 nikon 有後繼機都會用 cmos。(唔肯定！) 咁証明 cmos 有可能係唔錯暨。其餘暨早已証實 ccd 係好架啦！1D 用左 ccd！只此一部。d70 亦証明六百萬暨 ccd 超級啦！所以各有各好！除君心意。

[鬼火]

照我所知E300都有Metal Frame﹐仲有Aluminum外殼...

我試用過部300D﹐但係手感太似大部既DC﹐太Toy...

如果話E300太多unknown﹐咁ist* Ds 都唔係好好多...至少一個official既review都未出

係就係玩開﹐但係而家始終係半工讀﹐學費又貴﹐仲有自己既生活開支﹐正機例如20D或S3pro跟本就冇錢買 :(

[mrskyhook]

the hardware of *ist DS is very similar to *istD, so u can use it as reference.

the most unknown part of E300 is the new 8MP 4/3 sensor. The noise is a very big concern.

[鬼火]

One thing I don't understand, I see a lot of people taking ist* D as a reference for ist* Ds, but if they have so much in common, why would pentax continue to produce ist* D?

I've seen sample pictures of E300's beta machine and as ISO goes up noise does come into play quite a bit.

講多一點﹐我最常用應該係影風景...

[bbmimiling]

long term:
Canon is more common. Many lens for selection. A big 2nd hand market.
Nikon is expensive but good.
Pentax is uncommon. Not enough lens for selection. A small 2nd market.
short term:
300D is old model for a year. Other model is expensive too. The size is o.k.
D70 kit set is expensive. D70 is very large and nearly unacceptable.
ist DS kit is cheaper. Enough fuction. The size is very small. But the response is very slow in dark environment.
If I can choose again. ( I have brought many Pentax accessories)
I will choose Canon(not 300D)> Pentax> Nikon for long term. (I do not want to spend much on it)

[mrskyhook]

鬼火:

*ist D has more buttons and dial for better control. and *ist D can add hand grip. *ist D has better connection with flash and pc (i'm not sure what it is..)

*ist D and DS are different levels. but just Pentax is "sell big bread" to make DS as good as D!



actually i think D70 is not so expensive. It's only $6000. Is it the cheapest among 300D and *istDS? The kit lens is worth $2000 so it costs u $2k! if u just need the quality of EFS 18-55 (300D kit lens), just buy the D70 Body and something like Sigma 18-50.

[gaiuswong]

ist D 響用家心得度話對焦速度慢woo...連DSLR對焦速度慢就真係......不過話時話Pentax以前d film機套AF 糸統都唔係好正,ist D同E300我會揀E300.

[鬼火]

部機大幾時變左做DSLR既缺點? O_o
D70比起20D都係差唔多size...

我都認同D70部機本身唔貴﹐但係SLR/DSLR根本就唔係淨係著重部機﹐而係機同鏡既配合。D70冇18-70就不如唔好買

ist* Ds對焦好慢?其實都唔係太大問題﹐因為我通常都用手動對焦

[mpalex]

D70

[cola_cola_man]

我認為買得dslr, size 唔係一個最重要因素. 如果要細, 不如買番部dc 仔la.
d70 body 真係唔貴wor 同 300d 都係好接近, d70 body 行貨都係6080 之ma.
買機應該著重質素同配套

so, i perfer Nikon and Canon... especially is Nikon D70