[hsc]

請問一般來說cf咭快還是sd咭快呢

[老叟]

無分別,因為內邊都係一樣野黎----閃卡,不過外形唔同者!!

[hsc]

吾可以咁講,cf咭有幾十隻腳仔
但是sd咭只有十幾隻,應該愈多愈快啊.

[man24]

腳仔多就快d,都唔合羅輯..

[Shaq2003]

CF--------------Extreme III will have 20MB/s
SD only 10MB/s

[Elliott]

>>腳仔多就快d,都唔合羅輯..

雖然唔係一定 但係都有少少關係....
腳仔多d可以做 Parallel Transmission 唔係既只可以做 Serial Transmission... 如果行同一個 Freq. 既話 Parallel 會快 Serial 好多...

不過哩d Flash黎講唔係好快 最主要都係個粒Flash既speed... 個transmission channel 既 speed 應該遠遠可以afford到 無論Parallel or Serial好...

[John Lok]

Technical speaking, CF needs I/O chipset for reading & writing operation. SD is a direct-interface for I/O prcocess without any bridge between digital camera & memory. Because of being without I/O chipset, SD should be more faster than CF in terms of either reading or writiing data.

[ngcleric]

Shaq2003
>>> CF--------------Extreme III will have 20MB/s
>> SD only 10MB/s
Panasonic 出左 20Mb/sec 的SD card啦 =P

[hsc]

但是為何所有大機都有用cf咭呢?現在來說cf和sd咭價格差不多,如果sd咭真的可以比cf咭快,理應所有大機都應用SD咭啦.佢又細細片

[hsc]

仲有CF咭出到100X倍速啊...好快啊

[John Lok]

Such "BIG" cameras as Canon EOS 1Ds MK2 & 1D MK2 have already supported CF & SD as well. More DSLR cameras will be compatible with SD. It's just a matter of time.

[老叟]

CF體積佔優,有利未來特大容量記儲,尤其係CF-II,仲有好多發展空間,sd細粒好多,分分鐘又好快步SM後塵!!不過最早出局應該係xD,最多8mb係佢絕路!!

[John Lok]

Such leading memory manufacturer as SANDISK has already ceased development of CF type II a few years ago. Being a smaller storage, SD has an extreme benefit in terms of production cost & pricing. That's why SD will certainly dominate flash memory in the future.

SM has been out... the next will soon be MS & XD.

[ngcleric]

MS 係唔會out的，Sony d機仔幾多人買
xD就有可能會out

SD都有1GB，唔會out
機仔有1G用，都影到幾百張相啦，乜都夠啦

[hsc]

1.SONY 的MS out有什麼出奇呢?貴到死
2.XD我就吾多知啦.
3.SD1GB又有幾多呢?現在D手機都2百萬啦,一般DSLR都6~8百萬(1GB可拍250~300張的JPG),如用1600萬的單鏡機呢?10MB一張相啊,吾係好多啊
4.其實我個人覺得個速度都是其次,個制式上限容量才更重要,因為連打時的相片是記在部機內,慢慢COPY到張啊,當然咭快COPY都會快.
5.CF TYPE II呢,我覺得如果同一容量,而佢又平TYPE I好多,我都會用,因為我部部機都可以用TYPE II,但是MICRODRIVE就不用想了.....
6.新出了的攝錄機也是用CF咭啊,好像仲送4GB咭,如此看日後的DV機可能不用DV帶了,但是又為何佢又不用SD咭呢.是否SD咭容量上限問題呢?