近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
frankmylai
註冊: 2004-09-12
上載我的肖像
|
修理水機要收運費 ( VETO )? Post time: 12 月 27 日 |
|
|
今曰攞咗部 CANON 水貨壞機比龍都 ( VETO ) 修理, 用了10個月, 保養期未過. 佢話在本港修會貴D, 寄日本又要等 1~ 2 個月, 仲話要收兩佰幾元運費, 是否不合理?攞機時能否講數?
另外小弟唔係好識用電腦 , 請問用手提電腦 ( 用緊 WINDOW 98 ) 抄另一台電腦硬盤內的檔案, 用什麼接駁和方法最簡單?是否要另外装軟件?多謝指教!
|
|
|
|
 |
genewch
註冊: 2004-09-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 修理水機要收運費 ( VETO )? Post time: 12 月 27 日 |
|
|
Oh no, black store!
Why not take it to Canon customer services center in Hung Hom directly? It also services water goods with some charge, but it should be more reliable than taking it to the black store.
|
|
|
|
 |
frankmylai
註冊: 2004-09-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 修理水機要收運費 ( VETO )? Post time: 12 月 27 日 |
|
|
Thank you genewch, but I'm afraid the repair cost will be quite high, and
I didn't know Canon's service center services water goods. Anyway, thanks for your advise! Wish everybody be careful to buy water goods,
especially the captioned shop!
|
|
|
|
 |
embu31
註冊: 2003-05-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 修理水機要收運費 ( VETO )? Post time: 12 月 28 日 |
|
|
有錢就換過部俾你都得啦!你估Canon HK有生意都唔做咩!佢會收番(好似係)一佰八十蚊檢查費,不過報價後整可以扣番.行貨過保養有warranty card都係咁樣,不過費用有八五折.係都唔好再俾番間黑店賺呀!
講開龍X呢間黑店就火滾,敢死將絛其他人賣三十蚊既雜廠viewcam AV線賣九十八蚊俾我,最衰果日趕時間無行多步,唯有俾佢賺一次.(好彩都仲叫用得到)不過都算俾我認清呢間野!
|
|
|
|
 |
Philippe
註冊: 2003-06-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 修理水機要收運費 ( VETO )? Post time: 12 月 28 日 |
|
|
我自己都試過買水貨影音產品有以上問題(不是在龍都),其實係咪所有水貨都係咁(即係有保養等於冇保養),有冇人試過水貨可以唔駛錢就可以整到部機呢?
|
|
|
|
 |
fdman
註冊: 2003-11-05
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 修理水機要收運費 ( VETO )? Post time: 12 月 28 日 |
|
|
以前有無聽過部機係會「寄失」呢,真係可以有黑店溶左你部機去當parts賣,又耐佢唔x何,祝好運
|
|
|
|
 |
tam_dominic
註冊: 2002-10-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 修理水機要收運費 ( VETO )? Post time: 12 月 28 日 |
|
|
I have a pleasant experience with Center Point 1/F Sincere House.
My FZ-1 failed to focus at the far end within warranty right before X'mas 2002..
Center Point sent it to Japan and returned it to me in about 5 weeks with NO CHARGE at all.
The FZ-1 return to me with a repair note in Japanese stating the reason of failure.
|
|
|
|
 |
|