[d300]

唔該你評相之前, 首先自己影好啲自己嘅相先啦, 欠缺說服力.

http://www.dcfever.com/photosharing/myphotos.php?userID=103549

[usage]

佢又有咩得罪左你呀?

[d300]

冇呀 ! 一個唔識影相嘅人去評相, 係好多師兄的作品上亂評, 仲以為自己好勁,

[usage]

可唔可以比d sample 我睇下呀?

[文迪達]

有冇link呀????

[tam_dominic]

People keep posting here are improving because they practise deligently.

In this sense :
john young 是進步中的攝影人 because he keep posting here.

On the other hand 評相 is not welcome here and all over the world.
Instead 欣賞 others photo is the success key for us.

Happy shooting !

[micros]

評相唔使識影相﹐只要識睇相就得。
(如果係從技術上去評相就當別論。)

[yk]

不要太極端，任何人都可以評相，對的接受，不對的笑下便算。要有胸襟接受批評，這樣才會有更大的進步。
Happy shooting !

[d300]

呢個 網站 嘅 波仔 大家認識嗎 ?

john young 亂評的照片


在人地作品上咁大隻字太過份, 你話係唔係挑釁呢

[intel875]

to波仔, 你大可以公開呢張相的原相比大家睇下, 等佢冇得出聲

[yk]

看過john young評過的照片，他是有做過功課才去評的，但評得對與錯在此不與致評。但他在禮貌方面真的要檢討一下，希望能夠回到理性的探討，而不是挑釁的舉動。

[cheatcheat]

相係原圖既好，要經過事後調較都係垃圾一幅，無謂x啦。

[fever20d]

Well, I have read the comments from John and visited the links he attached.

I do feel that John has his grounds to support his comments.

[MN56]

>>>評相唔使識影相﹐只要識睇相就得。

同意！唔通要識騎馬或是練馬師先可以做馬評人？！好多音樂鑒賞家都唔識玩樂器架！！

>>>相係原圖既好，要經過事後調較都係垃圾一幅，無謂x啦。

事後調校都係創作既一部分，唔好話digital，菲林年代都係一樣。影、沖、曬、放，都係整張相創作既一部分，如果事後唔調校，咁就即係得番影果部分，因為沖、曬、放都可以事後調校！如果話事後調校都係垃圾，咁Ansel Adams既Zone System都係垃圾啦！好多黑房技術都係垃圾架啦！！

[MN56]

睇番John Young既評論，我覺得佢講既反而甚有道理，分析客觀，論據有力，並非無的放矢！