近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
ktt
註冊: 2003-11-20
上載我的肖像
|
請問Canon IXUS 40還是Ricoh Caplio R1好? Post time: 2 月 3 日 |
|
|
各位大大,小弟最近想買新相機,一直覺得Ricoh Caplio R1的28~135mm鏡好吸引但用家心得寫到部機一文不值~~~~~而Canon IXUS 40就都好似唔錯,所以想問下意見,謝謝!
|
|
|
|
 |
小班長ErikoB
註冊: 2003-10-04
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問Canon IXUS 40還是Ricoh Caplio R1好? Post time: 2 月 3 日 |
|
|
實用 r1 潮 ixus40
|
|
|
|
 |
digi33
註冊: 2004-08-23
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問Canon IXUS 40還是Ricoh Caplio R1好? Post time: 2 月 4 日 |
|
|
請問點實用呀?
|
|
|
|
 |
gaiuswong
註冊: 2004-03-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問Canon IXUS 40還是Ricoh Caplio R1好? Post time: 2 月 4 日 |
|
|
點實用?有28wide同4X zoom掛,不過d畫質就真係....未見驚喜,最近睇埋R1V d相,同R1分別不大!
|
|
|
|
 |
digi33
註冊: 2004-08-23
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問Canon IXUS 40還是Ricoh Caplio R1好? Post time: 2 月 4 日 |
|
|
28+4x+未見驚喜的畫質=實用 oooooooooooooo
Good
Thanks
|
|
|
|
 |
gapman
註冊: 2002-10-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問Canon IXUS 40還是Ricoh Caplio R1好? Post time: 2 月 4 日 |
|
|
Ricoh DC, forget it la ! The noise is horrible !
|
|
|
|
 |
cobra_qp_
註冊: 2004-12-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問Canon IXUS 40還是Ricoh Caplio R1好? Post time: 2 月 4 日 |
|
|
IXUS 40, GOOD
相 d 色自然, 好好, < $3000, 4百萬晒4R VERY GOOD. 電夠用,
細 DC, 我選 FX7 (5百萬像, 但貴D), IXUS 40 (4百萬像, 低玩)
This is my IXUS 40, photos, OK 咁啦.
http://www.dcfever.com/photosharing/myflatview.php?userID=112843
用家心得報告
http://www.dcfever.com/ureviews/userreviews.php?userID=112843
|
|
|
|
 |
mk07
註冊: 2004-06-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問Canon IXUS 40還是Ricoh Caplio R1好? Post time: 2 月 5 日 |
|
|
i can't believe. Ricoh Caplio R1
If i choice ixus 40 is average quality photo!
You may try it.
|
|
|
|
 |
man24
註冊: 2002-12-13
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問Canon IXUS 40還是Ricoh Caplio R1好? Post time: 2 月 5 日 |
|
|
To: cobra_qp_
原來ixus 40 可以加日期架
|
|
|
|
 |
limancho
註冊: 2004-12-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問Canon IXUS 40還是Ricoh Caplio R1好? Post time: 2 月 5 日 |
|
|
RICOH機係好既就唔會咁多人話佢畫質差啦!
信下人講啦,唔信既話睇下官方SAMPLE相。
http://www.ricoh.co.jp/dc/lineup.html
DC仔最好係CANON,可能係DIGIC晶片關係。
比起其它牌子真係好小NOISE,畫質較實淨!
如果要二選一的話,就簡CANON吧!
http://web.canon.jp/Imaging/ixus40/index-e.html#sam
|
|
|
|
 |
小班長ErikoB
註冊: 2003-10-04
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問Canon IXUS 40還是Ricoh Caplio R1好? Post time: 2 月 6 日 |
|
|
ixus40影出黎實淨.唔係 ma.影出黎有d濛ga owr.電就45mins內玩完.if 係mon放番原大黎睇.我覺得只有單鏡機果d sin真係叫靚
但唔計e樣.曬埋出黎 r1 and ixus40 都ok
|
|
|
|
 |
ktt
註冊: 2003-11-20
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問Canon IXUS 40還是Ricoh Caplio R1好? Post time: 2 月 6 日 |
|
|
Re: limancho
剛剛看過limancho兄你提供的RICOH官方SAMPLE相;實在唔多OK!所以小弟都係決定買佳能的ixus40。另外問下ixus40邊到買最平?謝謝各位。
|
|
|
|
 |
ich
註冊: 2004-09-07
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問Canon IXUS 40還是Ricoh Caplio R1好? Post time: 2 月 6 日 |
|
|
I took a Ricoh R1, Nikon 8400 and a film camera for my recent trip to New Zealand. The R1 did give me a BIG suprise by producing some very good pictures. I said this after comparing R1, 8400 and my film camera using Reala 100 and Valvia 50 slides. Even better than my 8400 for some photos.In average, the pictures are clearer than my 'HK' photos, may be NZ got cleaner air ;) On the other hand, photos taken by R1 from other occasions did not look out-standing before. In short, my conclusions about R1 are:
1)R1 can produce stunning pictures at plenty of light situations e.g. sunny days, indoor with mcuh light
2)It is 'hopeless' in indoor with low light illumination. Never got a good picture with internal falsh and low light situations.
R1 battery lasts VERY long. My relative did not take many photos.. about <500, and there was no need to recharge the battery after 10 days.
Very fast response time and zoom range is very good.
I would not recommend anyone to buy a R1 becuase of the poor performance under low night even using internal flash, unless tehy always shoot in sunny days. However, to say that the picture quality of R1 is bad and noisy, I cannot agree with that comment after my trip.
BTW, I have played with my friends' FX7 and IXY 40 recently. Not impressed at all, but i only took few shoots indoor and not after extended usage.
Just my 2 cents
|
|
|
|
 |
|