[marco80912]

基本function and 用料既分別我都知道
但我想問, 影出黎既相既質素係咪好大分別?
大家認為, 假如有一筆錢, 會買300D 配個靚鏡
or 買10d 配個cheap鏡??
請各位高手指教!!^^

[walkingfuture]

10D比300D和D70更有層次感。
反光鏡更加實淨﹐寧靜同無甘震

[stevefrancishk]

如果300D配靚鏡又好似唔係好襯喎．．．．
咁不如買支副廠鏡用住先，等儲多啲錢再買支靚鏡囉．．．
起碼10D個body實淨啲

[marco80912]

但我覺得10d 真係超重wor
如果配直倒+長鏡+flash 咪攞到手都軟?^^"

咁大家認為等350d出左睇睇佢既報告andprice
再決定買10d or 350d 好唔好?
還是就算出左350d, 質素同10d 都會差好遠?

thx!!

[genewch]

It's a "must" to live with the weight of a camera. The 1D mark II even weighs 1500g! You can keep fit with your camera every day and use it as a dumpbell. :P

[anthlai]

300D配靚鏡又好似唔係好襯喎 ?? Why you guys have this thinking?? Is that mean body is more important than lens?? What do you think if 20D + kit lens will got better pic quality than 300D + 17-40L? Please comment.

Anthony

[stevefrancishk]

To anthony,
你講得都有道理,但如果用300D會唔會"頭重腳輕"呢(我未試過)?
其實我本身用開10D既,重要日日揹住用,加埋都應該超過1500g...所以都習慣咗個重量....
但350D而家既資料又唔係好多,可以等多啲料發佈先決定都唔遲,我覺得如果唔係要追款既話而家10D都幾抵吖,好似同300D唔係差好遠,不過唔知重有冇行貨.....

[korea]

To anthlai:

'In SLR, quality of photo depends almost entirely on lens quality, but in DSLR, you can't say so. The attribute of Lens to CCD/CMOS ratio to photo quality may be 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, ...., nobody knows. But one thing is sure. DSLR body is much more important than SLR body to the photo quality.

"What do you think if 20D + kit lens will got better pic quality than 300D + 17-40L? " ......
Nobody is able to gvie you a fair comment unless he or she has carried out a control experiment under the same environment. Otherwise, 吹水.