[sleepingdogman]

本人是一名新手,三個月前買了canon 300D,有一些鏡頭問題想問問大家,希望大家指教一下 :)

1)鏡頭是否選光圈值越大越着數?

2)(Canon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 L IS USM)其實是否算得上一支全能鏡呢?它和(Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM)有何分別?它們的強弱項在那裏?

3)Canon 有無D普通標準鏡for日常生活架?希望budget唔好太貴la

4)是否平價的Canon Lens 一般都是用不過呢?

[mikechew]

I have question about the lense too.

as mentioned for 2nd item: i would like to compare, which brand is the best lense (in term of focus speed, photo quality or etc) for 28-300mm for canon 350D? sigma, tamron, or canon itself?

any recommendations and advice for me?
Thank you

[sleepingdogman]

Please Help ~~~~~~

[rtyper13]

小弟並非dslr的用家…不過都有少少意見既…"

1)光圈值越大，即係越細光圈啦…
本人就覺得…越大光圈越好喇（即係光圈值細）
coz個快門可以再快d…手震冇咁明顯
2)鏡頭…唔多識…幫你唔到…
3)聽聞呢…kit 鏡個焦距係較為常用既
4)幫你唔到…

[ken l]

日常用買支kit lens平平地幾舊水,100-400mm除非你影生態(雀鳥)如果唔係,都冇乜用,要皮幾嘢一支.28-300mm都唔啱日常用,大支 重 貴 又係皮幾二皮嘢一支

[sleepingdogman]

thanks all brother :P

[q9k]

3. 當然有，如果你要IS，28-135 IS ($3700)及17-85 IS ($4400)都可以作日常用途，但前者重少少長少少，用於300D焦距變?約44.8-216的中長距鏡，要Wide就要諗諗17-85 IS。

4. 未必，視乎你要求去到邊，Kit鏡本身都有唔錯?焦距同成像質素，不過冇得獨立買。另外出名平霸?50 1.8 II($660-680)就係一枝又Sharp又大光圈仲要係日本製造?好鏡，缺點係勁易入塵，所以買果時基本上你都可以唔使點check…

[sleepingdogman]

Thanks q9k brother,and Thanks all brother, 真的很多謝你們的意見,因為我真的是一個新手,而且唔識簡D好Lens 用,所以經常為此而煩惱....

其實如果用得EF-S 17-85 IS,你會否贊成買小小白多D呀?因為大家個價位唔差太遠, 而且小小白重係L lens tim, 成像會再好些是嗎?

至於50mm 1.8 II,其實可唔可以for日生活上用呢?即例如得閒無事影下D近野或人像咁...?

[ken l]

除非你已有kitlens如果唔係就先買kitlens or 17-85mm 然後買小小白,好多夾dslr小小白會易失焦,要上行搞

[mikechew]

I have question about the lense too.

i would like to compare, which brand is the best lense (in term of focus speed, photo quality or etc) for 28-300mm for canon 350D? sigma, tamron, or canon itself?

any recommendations and advice for me?
Thank you

[beancurdbean]

of course canon's 28-300L is the best lens for 28-300mm
however, it is too heavy and expensive
if you use DSLR but not DC, I thing consider to use more than one lens is better

[genewch]

It depends on what approach you take in photography. For convenience, a all-in-one lens is very convenient, but you have to sacrifice image quality. Even the 28-300mm L lens performs worse than other L lenses, and it's bulky. I prefer buying lenses which concentrates in the main purposes you intend to do. For example, for portraits, a medium tele is good enough. For scenery, a wide angle fits. Of course this approach sacrifices convenience.

[neuh]

"除非你已有kitlens如果唔係就先買kitlens or 17-85mm 然後買小小白,好多夾dslr小小白會易失焦,要上行搞"

Ken1 exactly described my case. I am new hand; first got 17-85 IS, then 小小白 (no 失焦), and am thinking of EF 50 f/1.8 II.

[ken l]

neuh
小小白冇失焦,你好彩喇,網上好多個案都指小小白在dslr有失焦現象,我共有7支鏡,原廠副廠,唯獨小小白有失焦(後移)以70mm最嚴重,約20mm以110mm段最準,200mm後移10mm左右,要上行搞搞佢...唉....冇修L鏡