[honyeong]

新手想問各位師兄大佬。

似家有350D+kit+50mm f1.8。
諗緊買枝macro 鏡（Canon 100mm macro），唔知各位可否合寶貴意見呢？
呢枝鏡好唔好呀？低唔低呀？又或有乜好介紹呢？

除了呢技macro，我還諗緊將來再加：
- 旅行用：Canon 17-85mm
- 同一枝較tele?鏡（exo. For 大雀？）
唔知咁配答點睇呢？

Thankyou

[ken l]

macro呢支梗系好啦,快靚正,對焦十十聲

[gaiuswong]

嘻嘻.... 支EF180 f3.5L 仲正呀! ........

[ken l]

鬼唔知咩!!一開二有多呀大哥,遲D整番支先..哈哈.....

[honyeong]

多謝倆位長期對我的指點。
按你們的意思，似乎向macro 鏡方面我都係暫時諗下枝Canon 100mm macro先，第時將來有錢，又想upgrade macro 先諗枝EF180 f3.5L。
八卦下先，咁枝EF180 f3.5L幾錢呀？

Thankyou

[ken l]

差唔多成皮嘢

[honyeong]

咁我真係遲下先諗枝EF180 f3.5L。暫時都係揾錢諗下枝100mm macro。
PS: 枝EF180 f3.5L係唔係macro 呀？

[genewch]

The 100mm macro lens is very sharp and very versatile to use. Both macro and portrait uses are very good. I wonder if the 180mm macro is slow in focusing. Also, the longer the focal length, the more difficult to control the lens. If a long working distance is not critical, I'd prefer the 100mm macro. For tele shots like bird photography, I wonder whether it's worthy to use a tele macro lens. There's no need, I think. A conventional tele (200mm, 300mm, or longer) may be more suitable.

[honyeong]

Thanks for your information.

[gaiuswong]

EF180 f3.5L三成一萬零幾, 我買果時萬一,到而家個價都上落唔大,算幾保值架,sure正過100 f2.8, 當然唔會係贏成條街果隻啦,始終佢係貴在L紅圈鏡有三塊UD(只係同小白爭一塊),同佢係長距既鏡marco,影野唔使烘咁埋.

[honyeong]

gaiuswong 兄，
咁被我?個新仔又係唔係用住枝100mm f2.8 先呢？然後遲下先諗枝EF180 f3.5L macro。
當然，就算100mm都唔係話買就買 … 都要儲下錢先la。
Thankyou

[gaiuswong]

其實100mm f2.8論質素用途係夠用有凸架啦,
我果時買EF180 f3.5L真係只係為左心引, 當時睇 Lens work 見佢個MTF chart d 線全部頂哂頂, 果時又咁岩想買支marco鏡,所以先拺左佢,
呢支marco鏡算係冷門,等於EF85 f1.2L VS EF85 f1.8, 值唔值就真係見仁見智.

[honyeong]

thousand thanks

[yausw812]

本人也在 85mm f1.8 和 100 mm marco 爭扎中...
如果選擇 ??

[ousi]

回yausw812:
一枝係macro一枝唔係. 影人, 用85la, 影macro, 一定係100macro la.
用100macro影人, 小心比model追打....(太sharp, 連豆豆都影埋, hoho)

回樓主:
100macro定180L, 係在乎你影乜. 如影蟲蟲多, 180L可以係遠d影....但100macro都好夠佢離.....2揀一就100macro先la, 真係好愛影macro先upgrade去180L la!

如不介意3-rd party, tamron支90 macro (di ver)都好正下, 不過膠左d, focus吵左dd, 但係2千5元有支90mm macro la wor!

色盲支180macro f/2.8都唔錯下, 見好多sample都幾好, 不過個tone好似有少少偏黃....(4千咁上下)