[sukaya]

有同事說數碼相機的相片不能作為呈堂證據，因為拍照的照片可以在photoshop任意刪改或加插任何東西，例如撞車，又說保險公司不接受數碼照片作為證據，以前的菲林底片就可作為證據，因為底片不會被人刪改，這個問題怎樣解釋？請各位高手指教。

[big 熊]

法律我就唔多識,但菲林一樣可以疊相!

[wewewawa]

現時香港法庭的確不接受數碼相片作為呈堂證據， 雖然菲林相一樣可以用黑房技術做手腳， 但警方係有些甚麼甚麼專家可以驗證一張菲林是否做過手腳的。 或者咁講， 數碼相做手腳比起菲林實在容易好多。

[Cheese]

咁如果我用raw檔做證據又得唔得呢?

[kunyu]

數碼相或者菲林影o既相都只是一種環境證據中的一種,重要配合其他方面的證據,先可以作出裁決,唔係用乜o野file o既問題,這問題可以多方面,所以唔好諗住整張做過手腳o既相就可以瞞天過海,法律唔會咁化學o既~~~

[mk07]

later,用菲林影o既相亦都可能重審tim??
會嗎?

[schindler]

但法庭仍然只接受菲林相片作為呈堂證據

留意警察拍照記錄都只用菲林機

[twynson]

嘜唔係未改過既相有攝影資料咩.......咁咪證明囉

[schindler]

嘜唔係未改過既相有攝影資料咩.......咁咪證明囉

改過的相未必冇攝影資料
就算冇左都可以加上去改埋都仲得

[darrens]

據知在外國,某些insurance company已買了一批data verification kit
可以供意外後使用DC/DSLR影之digital picture作證明
Canon亦有data verification kit,but 香港未有得出
如有朝一日香港改變法例, DC/DSLR影之digital picture+data verification kit可作呈堂証供的話,Canon market share一定會大升(現只有Canon推出data verification kit,but未知是否只供Canon EOS 1D mark2 series or other SD card camera for use)

[老叟]

數碼相一經修改,EXIF檔案梗有變動既!!

[cookiemerry]

Actually the newest road side speed camera are digital already.
Also the video recording at banks and shop are DVR and photd are capture from them as well.

It totally depends on how the photo was obtain (documented creation procedure to verify the file is unchange). And how important your case is. When the justice department have time to think about it.

[ousi]

It's just so hard to verify it.

If you know what hex-editor is, then can probably manipulate anything inside a file. After all, EXIF and other so-called checksum are just bits and bytes in the file, all editable if you've got the knowledge by using a hex editor.