[usage]

成日都話蔡司鏡頭好靚
點靚法?!
有冇d 比較?
如Contax C/Z 50mm f1.4 VS Canon EF 50mm F1.4?

[kanji]

可以去以下交流區看看

http://www.dcfever.com/forum/read.php?f=1&i=248703&t=248703&phorum_auth=2daf95933834761049eb24725918d47a

[cow_size]

我諗都係唔好比啦
個人覺得完全走緊兩條路線
加上再無謂野得其中一方 Fans 不滿啦

[andy826]

靚到好多人都讚

[YeungNick]

靚到九成九拍電影既人都用蔡司鏡

[ZeissIkon]

靚到太空館個半邊蛋入面部投射機都用蔡司鏡！

[cow_size]

咁我都整返句
"一日嘗蔡司, 一世用蔡司, 一顆永留存"

[wewewawa]

有幾靚用你的雙眼判斷。

[peter_]

其實唔止鏡頭會標榜蔡司鏡, 高質的業餘天文望遠鏡都會標榜用蔡司鏡..要知道天文望遠鏡的放大倍數可達幾百倍..所以鏡片的質素要求很嚴格.

[tam_dominic]

Although the following photos are USMed , contrast and saturation enhanced, we can still see the difference.
Personally I like Carl Zeiss more because the pleasant contrast and brilliant color which can never add by post processing.

蔡司鏡 Sony S70

Leica lens Panasonic FZ-1

Happy shooting !

[kanji]

post 一張用contax tvs 的大反差的相片先

f2.8 sharpness +1, +0ev

[kanji]

大家可以看看暗位表現.
tvs用了一支 carl zeiss　T* vario sonnar f2.8~4.8 7.3~21.9

[tam_dominic]

Though it is shoot uder different situation, the clarity of 蔡司鏡 is the best :

蔡司鏡 Sony S70


Sigma 100-300 F4


Canon kit lens

Happy shooting !

[tam_dominic]

Sorry can't show. Try again

Sigma 100-300 F4

[kanji]

睇落sigma都好靚, 如果你唔講仲以為係蔡頭影.