[shatin2]

如果只計成像,
唔知大家覺得邊支好D?

[hyuhin]

http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/review/2005/04/25/1432.html
本來呢個日文網相話比我地聽 tamron 差過 Sigma 好多
但第2次試相，結果完全不同！

[kingkonghk]

分別唔大, 睇熱愛咩野牌子

[neville_sitou]

usually tamron lens price is lower .

[tam_dominic]

I don't have answer and eager to know too.
The Japan site was very confusing.

[tkhhung]

Bought Sigma yesterday and price cheaper than Tamron almost HK$900. (2580 and 3480)

[tkhhung]

Sorry, mistake and both price based on 18-200.

[tonychengtl]

tkhhung,

Where did you buy the lens?

[old4]

本人剛入左sigma 18-200, 感覺失望多於歡喜
-成像.....實拍出黎覺得唔比Kit好。好多情況下甚至更差
-125同200價錢差1K, 但呢 125vs200 之間既焦距差距實際上好細, 值唔到1K
。嚴重後悔當時點解唔入125
-用開kit鏡既我, 事前無法想像到200mm既手震可以咁恐佈!! 手持基本上冇乜機會成功。即刻明白點解貴幾k都要IS

-至於走焦? 未發現

優點:
-光線ok的話, 對焦成功率(唔係講走唔走焦)高過Kit! 但光線不足既話同kit lens一樣死
-做工真係靚過kit以倍數計, 拿上手已經覺得唔係同一回事 (但可惜畫質....見上文)
-連bra bra~~
-的確適合代替kit鏡 (要求不嚴格的話), 因size同kit差唔多, 重量都ok, 甚至呢個重量先似返d樣。但如果代替kit不如慳1k買125, 反正手持用125以上焦段成功率非常低
-哈哈哈哈哈.........鏡頭有紅圈, 拆走個bra渣住出街好多時人地會以為你渣支L~ (純無聊虛榮, 但此優點好實在!! >DDDD )

[tonychengtl]

125vs200 之間既焦距差距實際上好細 <------Agree.
200mm既手震可以咁恐佈 <---- agree.

[tkhhung]

DC Fever Mongkok