[Leica Man]

細佬影相超過20年,技術唔敢認叻,但係屬於好咀尖?隻.

由MF年代老豆買?Canon AE-1, A-1, F1. 出?做?就用 AF ?Nikon F-801, F-90, F-90X, FM2. "誤交損友",中毒日深就用Leica-R, Hasselbad 503等..............在菲林年代,攝影專家冇我份,器材(扮)專家就充得?.

而家用數碼機,一直都睇?食飯 - 一來家道中落,二來數碼機真係眨值得太快,蝕到肉赤. 到而家都係玩過3部機 - Dimage 7, Sony DSC-V1, Canon Ixus-700. 暫時比較滿意都係 DSC-V1 (可能中Zeiss毒太深).

最近想轉DSLR, 都係屬意Nikon.原因係好多Nikon鏡 (80-200/2.8, 85/1.8, 135/2DC)都玩過,自己都係鐘意"sharp"多過"柔" (C fans 唔好鬧).

但最近發現 Fujifilm ?DSLR色彩好似十分正,合晒我呢個"好色之徒".尤其係 "glo"大哥?dcfever?相,簡直驚為天"機".

最近到旺角巡視,DC店員話:"亞哥你有眼光,唔係咁多人識欣賞呢部機?!" - 當然 "Sales靠得住,豬?會上樹".

友誠水貨賣$13350,諗落真係好貴,架機功能同D70s差唔多,但貴一倍.(除?唔係made in Thailand)

各位仁兄, Fujifilm S3 Pro 究竟係咪值得買呢?請賜教賜教.......

[老叟]

不如參考專業意見先啦,depreview.com有詳細報告結論,不過呢部機淨係支援cpu-電子鏡!!想用埋手動舊鏡,唯有D2X!!

[MR NGAI]

one shop sell hk$12,800!
at mk

[kanji]

我亦係比Fujifilm S3 Pro的顏色深深吸引, 可是沒有$$, 故玩著部D70先.
用S3PRO 同 用CONTAX, LEICA 一樣有品味.

[geofku]

新一代嘅 super CCD d 顏色同埋層次上都有改善。而家水嘢賣hk$12,800、我老友去年剛出時買 $15800。佢當時話唔貴、一支哈仔鏡都唔止la. 而家唔見咗 3000 la！不過佢老哥唔志在、而且部机在短短1年未夠已經比佢勞亦咗 7仟幾張。咁都算值得。

[Leica Man]

$12,800?? where

[Leica Man]

老叟兄:

depreview.com呢一類報告我其實睇過唔少, 結論係 - 美國佬寫?太死板!! 乜都講數據,圖表.......... 太科學化! 完全冇?\"人性"?觀感同結論.

香港D雜誌太怕死! 驚死得罪D大牌子,衰都唔敢彈.

D friend 話日本D攝影雜誌就最多料,敢彈又敢讚,又唔死板.衰在我讀得書少-唔識日文!

[PSP2004]

I have same feeling like yours.

Most HK magzaine is rubblish. But not all.



I remember one thing. About two~ three years, one guy said some DC is good. However, all people said it is a rubblish. He said he is the professional. He is the writer of some famous HK magazine. He said most of us is his reader. So that, we should not argue with him. He has professional knewlege to justify which one is good or bad.


Such PK.....

[andy3210]

Dpreview.com 係英國野來的.

數據性既理據才是最終既演繹, 人性化既評論只會帶來主觀既論調.

Dpreview 評呢部機只係 Above average. 一部今時今日既機仲係禁慢, 點同其他機款 Fight 呢?

[malretep]

我提議你E MAIL問GIO爺部機怎樣重好.
起碼都是用家.( GIO爺影人真係好Pro )

[kkyy]

Leica man,

Welcome to the DSLR club.

Just want to raise a point in your discussion, when you say you like the color of the camera, what exactly do you mean by that?

You like the colour because it accurately reproduces the colour as you see at the scene, or the colour that is different from the true scene but please you most?

I ask this because if you are asking for accuracy, then shoot a colour chart can give you an answer, dpreview for e.g.

If you like the colour after it is tweaked by the camera/sensor, then software can also do it for you, with the style that suits you most. Of course it is expensive like Photoshop but cheaper alternatives like PS element is quite affordable and sometimes as a free software. Afterall even a Fujipro should need post-processsing right?

I am not trying to deter you for any purchase, love is love. If other system, like Nikon, can provide you with better future expansion capabilities, is it also important?

Best of luck.

kkyy

[Leica Man]

andy3210:

唔係所有?都可以用"數據性既理據"?評價?! 你可以用數據測定 "shutter speed 準唔準", "曝光over定under","flash色溫準唔準" 等, 但唔可以100%用數據?決定鏡頭靚唔靚,影象好唔好.....

例如Leica名鏡90/2,MTF數據十分弱, 又話開大光圈唔掂,又話邊角位唔sharp...偏係?Leica fans愛到極,話影人像天下無敵!

評定靚機靚鏡係好以選美,要有?有眼光有taste夠pro?人?評定!! 否則駛乜評判??條女去度?砰?驗?咪做??姐啦!

[Leica Man]

回 kkyy,

顏色??相信唔係你講得咁simple!

我鍾意?係"顏色鮮艷",唔係"忠實". 正如一D玩Contax機?人話:"陰天影到變好天". 重有就係"層次豐富",好似在騎樓底影相都好有味道 - 唔會一邊黑晒,一邊白晒!

如果咁容易,玩菲林機就唔駛幾皮?買支歐洲名鏡(或?去?USSR鏡)啦.?隻鮮色D?菲林,又或?叫曬相佬幫你"谷"深D色咪得囉??

而家D數碼機兩三千蚊都有呢D?色功能,Canon Ixus 都有"slide color mode", "vivid mode" 啦. 效果自己睇啦.

Photoshop我都叫做識多少,但都唔係話咁易可以把相片變成"鮮艷","層次豐富". (不過如你可以??用粒幾鐘去執一幅相就可能得都未定?) 否則就 "學Photoshop好過學影相,買PC好過買DC"!

所有大相機廠都會有自己一套品質技術,呢D都會係"不傳之秘",又或者有patent! 否則就買乜機都冇所謂啦!

[kkyy]

Leica Man,

Judging from your style of repsonse to others, I just wonder what is the purpose of your original post?

Showing your style and taste with your appreciation of Fuji, or solicit others members' genuine opinion?

kkyy

[edoxli]

http://www.dcview.com.tw/article/newreadarticle.asp?id=3216
看下這條link
s3 顏色怕是dslr最美艷,比Leica-R, Hasselbad還要艷.怕你會放下Leica-R機.但有時又覺有點跨張.不能反映真實.
他的ccd寛容度亦是最佳.比美菲林.
可是反應其慢,比d70差很多.你用開菲林機一定唔習慣.