[eddfmc]

暫時唔多想花錢係鏡頭住, 但又唔想要kit lens, 所以想配隻50 1.8 II, 有冇其他提議

[Lemon[Nade]]

50mm 1.8f II
好野黎嫁..
便宜又大碗~

[beancurdbean]

如果唔多錢, kit lens 係好好用, 當然平鏡要收收光圈去用
如果有錢可以考慮 17-40L ($5k) , 17-85 IS ($4.5K), Sigma 18-50/2.8 ($3K), 24-105/4L IS (未出)
不過都要買支50/1.8先

[eddfmc]

但係會唔會有其他類似選擇...我指價錢同質素同50 1.8差唔多o既

[man1492]

"但係會唔會有其他類似選擇...我指價錢同質素同50 1.8差唔多o既"

No. 50/1.4 is a few times more expensive. For lenses under 1k, 50/1.8 kit lens are the only choices.

[beancurdbean]

定焦鏡唔過$2千, 只此一支, $6百幾無第2支咁好用

[nlsho]

28/2.8 & 35/2. Similar is size, as good performance, higher $ tap.

[eddfmc]

真係唔該晒各位...睇呢都係選50棄kit lens, 再儲錢買17-40L

[leepsj]

Oh, I dont think you should give up the kit lens 2. Both 50mm and the kit lenses are made respectively for different purpose. The kit lenses could be used to for landscape and travelling. And the 50mm will be very good to shoot portrait photograph.

Just take both la, both are only less than $700, but I doubt where you could get the kit lenses if you buy the body only in the first place.

[man1492]

"...睇呢都係選50棄kit lens, 再儲錢買17-40L "

17-40 L won't be shined on that camera.

[beancurdbean]

"17-40 L won't be shined on that camera. "

Will it shined on 5D?

[leepsj]

I read a book on 17 - 40 L in 300D, the writer seems to be comfortable with it ah!

The photographs have stood out blurred effect in portrait photographs.

[madxngai]

你可在網上買二手蔡思手動鏡，數百元有一隻，加上m42 mount，出來的質素不次於 canon 50 1.4，但要習慣手動對焦及測光！

[eddfmc]

其實我本來想買sigma 支18-50...但係我諗諗下...萬一canon將來將full frame sensor的機種降至我買得起o既水平, 咁到時我支 DC 鏡咪冇用...咁所以我依家不如儲多d錢等第時買支 35機用得o既鏡...咁樣諗岩唔岩呢唔知

[leepsj]

To madxngai,

"你可在網上買二手蔡思手動鏡，數百元有..."

For beginner, any good recommendations ah?