[dcpower]

左canon Pro 1 ,中sony R1,右OM E-300

[dcpower]

Canon Pro1, Sony R1 , Olympus E-300 - ISO 400

Sony R1 , Olympus E-300 - ISO 1600


紫光測試 :
Canon Pro1, Sony R1 , Olympus E-300

[peterchan04]

睇完 samples, 我買 om E300
一機 兩鏡 大平賣.
機又有形, ccd 又防塵.

[老叟]

一流規格構思,開始探測到市場胍搏,可惜用佢專用電池係一大,大敗筆!!

[fdman]

R1 有無咁正，掂

[alvincyt]

睇完之後，我覺得R1既usable ISO最高只能去到800，因為由1600已見多noise，ISO 3200我諗只可以叫〔好過冇〕咁大把。而且唔知佢會唔會好似Kodak部P880咁衰，ISO上到某個位就要降低張相既resolution (P880 iso 1600 只有0.8MP)

另外我想將佢既spec同p880比較一下：

DSC-R1:

21.5 x 14.4 mm CMOS (win)
10MP (win)
24 - 120 mm 5X 蔡司鏡 (lose)
F2.8 - F16 (win)
format: jpeg/raw (lose)
iso 160-3200 (win)
burst: 3ps, up to 3 images (lose)
colour mode: supports adobe RGB (win)
no movie mode (lose)
flash compensation: +/- 2EV (win)
2"可扭動LCD (draw)
2cm macro (win)
測光 (lose)
shutter: 30s - 1/2000s, Bulb (3 mins) (win)
Scene mode: Twilight, Twilight Portrait, Landscape, Portrait (lose)
包圍曝光: 3 images (lose)
white balance (lose)
self-timer: 10 sec (lose)
remote: optional (win)
no time lapse recording (lose)
no internal storage (lose)
power: 1200mAh Lithium-Ion (lose)
用相機駁adapter叉電 (lose)
memory: CF, MS (win)
hot shoe位 (lose)
手感: 大部D應該好D, 聽人講P880太細部, 扭zoom ring時會磨擦到握柄既右手手指 (win)
另購配件選擇 (win)
Price: USD$1000 (lose)


P880:

1/1.8" CCD (lose)
8MP (lose)
24-140mm 5.8X 施奈德鏡 (win)
f2.8-f8.0 (lose)
format: jpeg, tiff, raw (win)
iso 50-1600 (lose)
burst: 2 fps, maximum 12 images in standard JPEG mode at full resolution, 兼有後取式連拍 (win)
color mode (lose)
movie mode: 640 × 480 pixels at 30 fps (win)
flash compensation: +/- 1EV (lose)
2.5"不可扭動LCD,但由於比較大,手動focus較容易,that's important(draw)
5cm macro (lose)
測光: 有selectable zone AE (25 positions） (win)
shutter: 16s - 1/4000s, Bulb (lose)
Scene mode: sports, sunset, backlight, candlelight, text/document, manner/museum, snow, beach (win)
包圍曝光: 3 or 5 images (win)
white balance: 有3個自設 (win)
self-timer: 10 or 2 sec (win)
no remote supported (lose)
Time lapse burst mode: 10 sec-24 intervals, 2–99 images (win)
32MB internal storage (lose)
power: 1700mAh Lithium-Ion (win)
有獨立charger叉電 (win)
memory: SD/MMC (lose)
hot shoe位係正鏡頭上 (win)
手感: 聽人講P880太細部, 扭zoom ring時會磨擦到握柄既右手手指 (lose)
另購配件選擇 (lose)
Price: USD$599 (win)


比較過之後，覺得R1都唔係一面倒好過P880，但P880又平咁多。我諗除非P880既photo quality比R1差好多，否則應該都係P880既性價比高一D。當然，如果我有錢到覺得相差HK$3000唔係錢的話，我就梗係買R1啦！

[KICX]

PRO - 1 唔係咁差下ma???

[bmbb]

其他唔使睇~
淨係睇 21.5 x 14.4 mm CMOS vs 1/1.8" CCD
根本DSC-R1 贏晒~
1/1.8" CCD 除非用 macro, 否則好難影淺景深~

對好多話無錢買鏡的人好吸引.
用 Kit 套裝 價錢, 買到 L 鏡質數~

好似我咁, 用DSRL 唔係因為佢用反光鏡,
大部份原因係因為可以影到淺影深
所以EVF 同單鏡就無所謂.
有時可以扭的LCD 比 單鏡仲方便好多
(其實我好想DSRL加多個mode.
可以鎖上反光鏡後,用可以扭的 LCD 睇住影相.
但講親都比人鬧)

缺點係有錢都無得換長鏡
(如果佢出 14.6-200mm 蔡司 T* 就唔換都無所謂)

[beancurdbean]

係咁差, canon失敗之作, 因為CCD太細, L鏡頭都死
同一道理, 所以R1好過DSLR?E-300, 因為sensor size大

[man1492]

Impressive noise control.

[leepsj]

Shutter speed of upto 1/2000s may not be sufficient ah!

[alvincyt]

"其他唔使睇~
淨係睇 21.5 x 14.4 mm CMOS vs 1/1.8" CCD
根本DSC-R1 贏晒~
1/1.8" CCD 除非用 macro, 否則好難影淺景深~"

1/1.8 可以加tele鏡加強景深
$3000差價夠買一塊1.7X tele有突
當然效果仍然不及R1
但價錢實在差太遠。

需知R1定價比部份入門DSLR更高，所以買佢而不買DSLR既原因只有一個，就係要一機走天涯。

但R1又冇一機走天涯所應有既配備，例如得5X zoom，加多塊1.7X都係得200mm，又冇movie capture，又冇防震。

如果呢部機可以定價US$850以內，就一定係呢兩個月出既prosumer機首選。

[SAMNG8882000]

照spec睇我覺得R1似一件工程工具般實用，非常期待。但它現時標價$999美元，計過往例子到港後，實際估計售價約多少呢？請告之，謝謝。