[sammy_hi]

大家好：

我是旅行友，一機走天下。
本身用開A2, 但對S9500頗有興趣！
S9500有900 萬象 + ISO1600 + 300 TELE；
A2就800萬象 + ISO800 + 200 TELE ，但ANTI-SHAKE出色！
本人另有FUJI F10，它對NOISE的表現真的強（但紫邊就…），
所以對FUJI 較有好感！
現我正心大心細中，想TRADE IN A2 轉 S9500。

請各朋友給予意見，A2 好還是 S9500 較佳？
另 S9500 有沒有紫邊問題及請問 KM 的閃光燈可否用在 S9500 上？

煩請多多指教！多謝！

[老叟]

講質素二部都咁好,不過S9500用AA電,新一代CCD,有著數!!
KM閃燈唔可以直接用係S9500度,要另購轉換器!!

[digtial_sniper]

yo Sammy~!

i use KM A200 and also been think of this trade-in or not considersation... and i came up a conclusion (works for me, not trying to push u anything, just to share my opinon)

1. i use KM A200 mostly day time, i dont' usually shoot too-speedy stuff such as sport event.... so ISO 200 & below works for me already, but Anti-shake is something S9500 didnt' provide... even tho it has its dedicated "anti-blur"....maybe i didnt' do much research on that yet..but i assume Minolta's AS should be far more superior....that's why i didnt' trade in the "AS" w/ "ISO up to 1600"

2. for range, S9500, apparently, impressed me ALOT! YES!! a very usable range of 28~300, basically covers all usual shooting range.
For tele shot, KM A-series 's 200mm max. seems not quite enough....but for tele shot,again, AS/IS is mostly a MUST to have (u don't always want to bring a tripod walk w/ u the entire day ...do u??), that's why i'm looking forward for FZ30, (i already know its noise probably worst than A200...but again, stay ISO 100 and below should somehow solve it), i mean....if u only have a 3x or 4x DCs, and not feeling annoying to bring a tripod, then S9500 is very good choice : )

3. memory cards: again, i'll say S9500 won the price here, but not 100% scored.... it use dual slots, xD and CF, which is apparently very very convinence! ^__^ however....when u want to set which card slots to use, u have to go all the way back to the menu's menu to set....@ this point, Olympus C7070 did a far better job.... 1 button to choose xD/CF

4. handling: no need to guess too many....i assume its handling should be as good as A2/A200, its lens barels seems identical w/ A2....so it wont' take u any time more to get use to it; FZ30's barrel and zoom ring slight bigger...so it'll take me a while figured out how to handling it in a more comfort way

i want ISO 1600, but also want OIS in tele shot, that's why i bought the Fuji F10, and wait for FZ30's price reach USD $540 and below : )

that's all my 2 cents, hope it give u some more ideas

[digtial_sniper]

and i think that 轉換器 can get u another 3rd-party flash light already : P

[99010003]

Digitial sniper, Do you mean that....

Converter can be used in S9500, so that it allow the DC to use ettl function of the 3rd-party flash light?

[digtial_sniper]

99010003:

no...... unfortunately.... just mean for the price u paid the adatper, u can probably use the same amount of $$$ to get another 3rd-party externa flash light which hook directly onto that hot shoe

the S9500 hotshoe only support standard non-eTTL flash light anyway

[99010003]

O... This is really disappointed for many years from 6900z to s9500.

Indeed the flash light system of Fuji prosummer dc is not enough.

[sammy_hi]

多謝各方意見！

99010003： 你是 S9500 的專家，請問它的紫邊問題如何？
因 F10 紫邊頗「出色」！
另可否再加1.5x 遠攝鏡、0.8x 廣角鏡等？

digtial_sniper：非常詳盡的分析，多謝！
但我另有一點請問，A2 及 S9500 的影像質素如何？
相差100萬象，究竟差多少？
另 KM 及 FUJI 的鏡頭，哪個較佳？

煩請再多多指教！多謝！

[99010003]

多謝你的褒獎, 不過我一定唔敢認, 實比人插, 我只是比較鍾意發噏瘋.

言歸正傳, 如果你覺得F10 紫邊頗「出色」, 甘相信佢個表現同S9500差唔多(因為我邊沒有F10所以只有信你的) 個人觀感, 當我用F4光圈以下時, S9500 的紫邊係少過 S7000, 而用35 mm時,紫色也少過s7000 的 紫邊, 不過 28WIDE 時+F4以上光圈 紫邊 同 S7000差唔多.

不過由於多左PIXEL 來做計算所以紫邊比較薄左. (我唸大家或只知其一, 不知其二. 紫邊形成的物理環境大家都知, 大家未必知在CCD 接收影像後, 兩粒鄰近的RGB CELL 會因為2 X RGB CELL = 4 UNIT 的G SIGNAL 的 落差太強造成, 理論上同一SIZE 下越多CCD CELL 就越有多些資料進行計算, 紫邊這種情況會得到減少(少點PIXEL受影響. F10 CCD SIZE 1/1.7 6MP VS S9500 CCD SIZE 1/1.6 9MP).
(以上只是個人意見, 一定唔敢叫你同意我)

不過我非藐視事實之徒, 紫邊的而且確在FUJI 機係明顯啲. 但點解玩DC影相甘耐都仍然用 FUJIFILM PROSUMMER 機, 只因我認為紫邊如太明顯時可用後期去減,但DETAIL的流失就沒法用後期去補了.

另外未用過1.5 鏡, 所以唔咁講, 不過我用tcon1.7就可以由200開始沒黑角.
而用wcon0.8會有小小黑角, 用3:2 setting 會沒左黑角但仍可以体到明顯闊左不少(上下都係), 如果用平常9mp setting, 甘可在加了wcon0.8 後 around 30mm 就無黑角.

[sammy_hi]

Any more idea? please

[200448]

加鏡

http://konicaminolta.com/products/consumer/digital_camera/dimage/dimage-a2/10_5.html

[99010003]

For all your further information:

In FujiFilm S7000 it use ring 55mm after adding the adapter tube. In Fujifilm it default ring is 58mm. As I after try several of static tele and wide angle lens of "canon","HAKUBA","OLYMPLUS","Fujifilm"etc during i use S7000, and i find that the remarkable Tele is Olymplus B300 and Wide is Olymplus WCON0.8. Since i still employ both of them on my S9500, then i need to use the converter ring from 58mm to 55mm, Some people may said after add the converter which may leads the black corner appear when use additional 0.8 wide lens. It is correct, but not 100% due to the converter. Since if just place the 0.8 wide lens in front of S9500 without add the ring, the dark corner still occur. So obviously it is due to the Wcon0.8 is 55mm, so its image can't cover the 28 wide lens of S9500.

So a new question rise, Any people can suggest better static (wide/tele) lens for 58mm DC?

[99010003]

By the way, sammy_hi i may use S9500 and Tele and wide for site visit of my job on monday. If the weather is OK, then i may try to take some photo. But i face the problem of how to post it and where can post it for shar....... Any idea for that?

[99010003]

sorry typing mistake shar --> share

[kkkleung]

s9500 can zoom during movie mode?
For the optical zoom, is it uses manual zoom ring like A200?